Table A7.

The methodological quality assessment results of systematic reviews.

Study	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Q5	Q6	Q7	Q8	Q9	Q10	Q11	Overall Appraisal
Husebo et al., 2020 [46]	Y	Y	Y	Y	U	U	U	U	U	Y	Y	Include
Jensen et al., 2017 [27]	Y	U	Y	Y	U	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Include
Howes et al., 2021 [23]	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	U	U	Y	Y	Include

Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unclear, NA = Not applicable. JBI critical appraisal checklist for systematic reviews: Q1 = Is the review question clearly and explicitly stated? Q2 = Were the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question? Q3 = Was the search strategy appropriate? Q4 = Were the sources and resources used to search for studies adequate? Q5 = Were the criteria for appraising studies appropriate? Q6 = Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently? Q7 = Were there methods to minimize errors in data extraction? Q8 = Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? Q9 = Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? Q10 = Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data? Q11 = Were the specific directives for new research appropriate?