Table A8.
The methodological quality assessment results of quasi-experimental studies.
Study | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Overall Appraisal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bautrant et al., 2019 [25] | Y | Y | U | N | U | Y | Y | U | Y | Include |
Lau et al., 2019 [26] | Y | Y | U | N | U | Y | Y | U | U | Include |
Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unclear, NA = Not applicable. JBI critical appraisal checklist for quasi-experimental studies: Q1 = Is it clear in the study what is the ‘cause’ and what is the ‘effect’ (i.e., there is no confusion about which variable comes first)? Q2 = Were the participants included in any comparisons similar? Q3 = Were the participants included in any comparisons receiving similar treatment/care, other than the exposure or intervention of interest? Q4 = Was there a control group? Q5 = Were there multiple measurements of the outcome both pre and post the intervention/exposure? Q6 = Was follow up complete and if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow up adequately described and analysed? Q7 = Were the outcomes of participants included in any comparisons measured in the same way? Q8 = Were outcomes measured in a reliable way? Q9 = Was appropriate statistical analysis used?