TABLE 3.
Comparison of different methods tested on the S350 dataset
| Overall | Stabilizing mutations | Destabilizing mutations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method | σ | r | σ | r | σ | r |
| BayeStab | 1.09 | 0.75 | 1.29 | 0.66 | 1.37 | 0.62 |
| DUET | 1.31 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 2.23 | 0.28 |
| DynaMut2 | 1.37 | 0.66 | 1.16 | 0.63 | 2.01 | 0.38 |
| SDM | 1.80 | 0.52 | 1.43 | 0.42 | 3.12 | 0.15 |
| mCSM | 1.08 | 0.66 | 1.01 | 0.63 | 2.48 | 0.31 |
| MAESTRO | 1.79 | 0.55 | 1.52 | 0.43 | 1.37 | 0.61 |
| I‐mutant | 1.75 | 0.53 | 1.42 | 0.42 | 2.89 | 0.25 |