Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 11;10(10):1990. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101990

Table 2.

Model-fitting result of the prospective analysis of depression as a predictor to glycemic control, controlling for covariates (fixed effects) and adjusted for within-person change over time (random effect), number of observations = 577.

HbA1c
Estimate Std. Error 95% CI Wald’s p
upper lower
Intercept 8.81 0.97 6.95 10.59 <0.001
TGDS −0.15 0.06 −0.26 −0.03 0.01
TGDS quadratic polynomial 0.015 0.006 0.003 0.03 0.01
Age −0.02 0.01 −0.05 0.005 0.13
Female 0.22 0.23 −0.20 0.66 0.31
Duration of DM 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.07 <0.001
EQ VAS −0.01 0.003 −0.02 −0.005 <0.001
LDL cholesterol 0.003 0.003 0.0001 0.006 0.04
Insulin used 0.36 0.14 0.08 0.68 0.01
Risk of malnutrition 0.17 0.16 −0.14 0.48 0.29
Level of physical activity Low - - - - -
Moderate 0.05 0.10 −0.14 0.24 0.59
Vigorous −0.06 0.13 −0.30 0.20 0.65
Cigarette smoke Never - - - - -
Former 0.22 0.26 −0.27 0.70 0.24
Current −0.35 0.27 −0.86 0.17 0.18
Present of DR −0.11 0.17 −0.43 0.23 0.54
Present of DN 0.19 0.13 −0.06 0.43 0.13
BMI > 25 −0.10 0.14 −0.37 0.16 0.46
Random effects Estimate Std.Dev.
Intercept 0.65 0.80
Residual 0.67 0.82

TGDS = Thai Geriatric Depression Score, EQ VAS = EQ visual analogue, LDL= low-density lipoprotein, DR = diabetic retinopathy, DN = diabetic nephropathy, BMI = Body Mass Index, Std.Dev. = standard deviation.