Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 11;11(20):3158. doi: 10.3390/foods11203158

Table 7.

The effect of different antioxidants on the relative mRNA gene expression of laying hens.

Tissue Genes Control VE CA PF L SEM p-Value
Magnum HO-1 0.53 c 1.09 a 0.88 b 1.05 a 1.09 a 0.044 <0.001
SOD1 0.47 c 1.19 a 0.89 b 1.20 a 1.14 a 0.054 <0.001
GSH-Px 0.44 c 0.89 a 0.65 b 0.98 a 0.94 a 0.045 <0.001
CAT 0.51 c 1.03 a 0.71 b 1.07 a 1.00 a 0.046 <0.001
Nrf-2 0.63 c 1.21 a 0.93 b 1.18 a 1.17 a 0.049 <0.001
P38MAPK 0.55 c 1.24 a 0.96 b 1.28 a 1.26 a 0.058 <0.001
Liver HO-1 0.46 c 1.13 a 0.87 b 1.11 a 1.15 a 0.052 <0.001
SOD1 0.61 c 1.22 a 0.92 b 1.21 a 1.21 a 0.050 <0.001
GSH-Px 0.41 c 0.85 a 0.62 b 0.95 a 0.91 a 0.045 <0.001
CAT 1.17 1.18 1.16 1.17 1.14 0.016 0.929
Nrf-2 0.55 c 1.15 a 0.84 b 1.13 a 1.12 a 0.051 <0.001
P38MAPK 0.90 c 1.41 a 1.20 b 1.48 a 1.52 a 0.052 <0.001

VE 0.02% = vitamin E; CA 0.24% = chlorogenic acid; PF 0.05% = polyphenol; L 0.03% = lutein; SEM = standard error of mean, n = 6. The small letters in each row represent significant differences among treatments; a post-hoc Duncan test was used for means comparison. Significance was set at p < 0.05.