Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 31;10(5):e02927-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02927-22

TABLE 2.

Antimicrobial activity of imipenem-relebactam and comparators against Enterobacterales during the SUPERIOR and STEP surveillance studies broken down by countries

All enterobacterales (no. tested)/antimicrobials EUCAST
CLSI
Sb
I
R
S
I
R
MIC50 MIC90 Range No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %
All Enterobacterales in Spain (n = 359, SUPERIOR)
 CZAa 0.12 0.5 ≤0.03 to >64 356 99.2 3 0.8 356 99.2 3 0.8
 CTZa 0.25 8 0.12 to >32 314 87.5 45 12.5 314 87.5 5 1.4 40 11.1
 IMRa 0.12 0.5 0.06 to >64 351 97.8 8 2.2 337 93.9 14 3.9 8 2.2
 IMI 0.12 1 0.06 to 64 351 97.8 2 0.6 6 1.7 334 93.0 17 4.7 8 2.2
All Enterobacterales in Portugal (n = 388, STEP)
 CZA 0.12 0.5 ≤0.03 to >64 387 99.7 1 0.3 387 99.7 1 0.3
 CTZ 0.25 8 0.12 to >32 335 86.3 53 13.7 335 86.3 9 2.3 44 11.3
 IMR 0.12 0.5 0.06 to 64 386 99.5 2 0.5 383 98.7 3 0.8 2 0.5
 IMI 0.12 1 0.06 to 64 367 94.6 5 1.3 16 4.1 358 92.3 9 2.3 21 5.4
a

Imipenem-relebactam (IMR), ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), and ceftolozane-tazobactam (CTZ) were tested with a fixed concentration of 4 mg/liter of relebactam, avibactam and tazobactam.

b

S/I/R, susceptible, standard dose/susceptible, increased exposure/resistant, by EUCAST; susceptible/intermediate/resistant, by CLSI.