Table 2.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients of phenolics (TPC, TFC, TFAC, and TMAC) and antioxidant capacity (via DPPH and FRAP) in the peel and pulp of ‘Qiangcuili’ and ‘Cuihongli’ plums.
| TPC | TFC | TFAC | TMAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCL-P | DPPH | 0.950 ** | 0.936 ** | 0.824 ** | 0.094 |
| FRAP | 0.908 ** | 0.495 * | 0.770 ** | −0.582 * | |
| CHL-P | DPPH | 0.891 ** | 0.796 ** | 0.307 | 0.489 * |
| FRAP | 0.913 ** | 0.839 ** | 0.746 ** | 0.395 | |
| QCL-F | DPPH | 0.952 ** | 0.935 ** | 0.888 ** | 0.107 |
| FRAP | 0.938 ** | 0.632 ** | 0.798 ** | −0.610 ** | |
| CHL-F | DPPH | 0.894 ** | 0.929 ** | 0.428 | 0.660 ** |
| FRAP | 0.844 ** | 0.972 ** | 0.944 ** | 0.588 * | |
Note: “*” denotes significant differences between various indicators by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). ”**” denotes significant differences between various indicators by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.01). QCL-P and CHL-P represent the fruit peel of ‘Qiangcuili’ and ‘Cuihongli’, respectively. QCL-F and CHL-F represent the flesh of ‘Qiangcuili’ and ‘Cuihongli’, respectively.