Authors	Effectiveness	Effectiveness Themes	Barriers to Adoption	Barrier Themes
Borosund et al.	Decreased symptom distress, decreased depression, increased self-efficacy	Improved mental health	Must train users	Must train users
		Improved mental health
		Improved mental health
		Improved mental health
Freeman et al.	Less fatigue, less cognitive dysfunction, fewer sleep disturbances	Improved sleep outcomes	Must train users	Must train users
		Improved sleep outcomes
		Improved sleep outcomes
Wheelock et al.	This intervention facilitated symptom reporting and may provide a means of convenient symptom assessment, Intervention reduced feedback time to patient	Provided education/answered questions	Adds workflow that may not be reimbursed	Time of providers/workflow
				Low reimbursement of treatment
Galiano-Castillo et al.	Improved quality of life, physical health, cognitive functioning, pain severity, and pain interference	Improved physical health	cost	Cost of intervention
		Improved sleep outcomes
		Less pain
		Improved quality of life
Admiraal et al.	Not statistically significant for primary and secondary outcome, however, clinically distressed patients increased optimism and control over future	Improved mental health	Setup costs	Cost of intervention
		Improvements not statistically significant
Fazzino et al.	Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity significantly increased from baseline to 6 months.	Improved physical health	Cost of equipment. Time of providers	Cost of intervention
		Improved body image
		Improvements not statistically significant
Han et al.	the effectiveness of the Information and Support services was attenuated in more complex versions of Full CHESS or Full CHESS + Mentor	Provided education/answered questions	Cost of system	Cost of intervention
Uhm et al.	Improved exercise, but not statistically different than control	Improved physical health	cost of system	Cost of intervention
		Improvements not statistically significant
Kim et al.	Improved drug adherence, lower side effects of chemotherapy (nausea, fatigue, numbness of hand or foot, and hair loss). Improved quality of life. No significant difference in depression or anxiety	Improved medication adherence	Cost of system, must train users	Cost of intervention
		Less nausea/vomiting		Must train users
		Improved sleep outcomes
		Less numbness
		Improved quality of life
McCarthy et al.	participants reported improvements in sleep outcomes, including SE and SL. QOL and daily functioning improved, but anxiety and depression did not.	Improved sleep outcomes	Provider’s time	Time of providers/workflow
		Improved quality of life
Visser et al.	Not effective.	Improvements not statistically significant	Not effective. Cost of equipment	Intervention not effective
				Cost of intervention
Zachariae et al.	Reduced insomnia, increased sleep quality, increases sleep efficiency, increased total sleep time, improved time in bed, reduced fatigue	Improved sleep outcomes	Must train users	Must train users
		Improved sleep outcomes
		Improved sleep outcomes
		Improved mental health
Ariza-Garcia et al.	Functional capacity improved significantly, abdominal strength, lower body strength, back strength	Improved physical health	Must train users	Must train users
		Improved physical health
		Improved physical health
		Improved physical health
Crafoord et al.	Engagement related to feeling of being valued which affected satisfaction	long-term engagement with intervention	Must train users	Must train users
		Provided education/answered questions
Ferrante et al.	Improved weight loss, improved waist circumference, improved quality of life, improved healthy eating, decreased calories consumed	Improved physical health	Must train users	Must train users
		Improved body image
		Improved quality of life
Fjell et al.	statistically significant less symptom prevalence in nausea, vomiting, feeling sad, appetite loss and constipation. Overall symptom distress and physical symptom distress were rated statistically significant lower in the intervention group. Further, emotional functioning was rated statistically significant higher in the intervention group.	Less nausea/vomiting	Must train users	Must train users
		Less nausea/vomiting
		Improved mental health
		Improved mental health
		Improved physical health
Hou et al.	Mean quality of life scores and global health higher	Improved quality of life	Must train users	Must train users
		Improved physical health
Lally et al.	post hoc analysis showed significant group differences in slopes occurring between study months 2 and 3 on distress and depressive symptoms	Improved mental health	Must train users	Must train users
		Improved mental health
Lozano-Lozano et al.	Both groups showed improved outcomes, but global QoL was significantly better with intervention. Improvement in upper-limb functionality also higher	Improved quality of life	Uses more time of clinicians	Time of providers/workflow
		Improved arm symptoms/upper limb functionality
van der Hout et al.	none	Improvements not statistically significant	No difference between groups, cost	Intervention not effective
				Cost of intervention
Çınar et al.	QoL of the treatment group after intervention increased and distress level was lower	Improved quality of life	Must train users	Must train users
		Improved mental health
Fang et al.	Decrease in body image & distress	Improved body image	Decrease in body image, regret, anxiety, & distress	Intervention not statistically effective
		Improved mental health		Must train users
		Improved mental health
		Improved mental health
Krzyzanowska et al.	none	Improvements not statistically significant	No differences in self-efficacy, anxiety, or depression	Intervention not statistically effective
Kumar et al.	Distance was overcome through teleconsultation	Provided education/answered questions	Cost of equipment. Time of providers	Cost of intervention
				Time of providers/workflow
Lai et al.	Distance was overcome through teleconsultation. Patients regained full functional status and full range of motion	Provided education/answered questions	Cost of equipment. Time of providers	Cost of intervention
				Time of providers/workflow
Öztürk et al.	Effective at decreasing nausea-vomiting, raising sexual function and sexual enjoyment	Less nausea/vomiting	cost, training	Cost of intervention
		Less nausea/vomiting		Must train users
		Improved quality of life
		Improved physical health
Reeves et al.	Improved weight reduction (over control) fat mass, metabolic syndrome risk score, waist circumference, fasting plasma glucose, and quality of life	Improved body image	cost, training	Cost of intervention
		Improved body image		Must train users
		Improved body image
		Improved fasting plasma glucose
		Improved quality of life
Wagner et al.	Reduced fear of recurrence. Telecoaching improved adherence and retention.	Improved mental health	Cost, time, training	Cost of intervention
		long-term engagement with intervention		Time of providers/workflow
Bandani-Susan et al.	Decreased fagigue, increased body image	Improved sleep outcomes	cost, training	Cost of intervention
		Improved body image		Must train users
Fu et al.	Less pain, less soreness, less swelling, less heaviness, less redness, less limited movement in shoulder	Less pain	cost, training	Cost of intervention
		Less pain		Must train users
		Less pain
		Less numbness
		Improved arm symptoms/upper limb functionality
Gao et al.	Improved mental health at follow up.	Improved mental health	cost, training	Cost of intervention
		Improved physical health		Must train users
Medina et al.	ICOnnecta supports the development of a digital relation with healthcare services	Improved mental health	cost, training	Cost of intervention
				Must train users
Oswald et al.	Improvements in insomnia, sleep efficiency, and sleep disturbance	Improved sleep outcomes	cost, training	Cost of intervention
		Improved sleep outcomes		Must train users
		Improved sleep outcomes