Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 20;20(5):525–532. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2021.0017

Table 3.

Pairwise Differences in Limb Volumes and Lymphedema Diagnosis Among the Four Symptom Groups

Variables All sample; N = 568, n (%) No symptom (1); n = 142, n (%) Only swelling (2); n = 34, n (%) Only pain (3); n = 204, n (%) Lymphatic pain (4); n = 188, n (%) Fisher's exact p-value; with B-Ha adjustment
Lymphedema diagnosis           1 < 2; p- < 0.001*; 1:3; p = 1.00; 1 < 4; p < 0.001*; 2 > 3; p < 0.001*; 2 > 4; p = 0.427; 3 < 4; p < 0.001*
 Yes 124 (21.8) 7 (4.9) 19 (55.9) 10 (4.9) 88 (46.8)
 No 444 (78.2) 135 (95.1) 15 (44.1) 194 (95.1) 100 (53.2)
Interlimb volume >5%           1 < 2; p < 0.001*; 1:3; p = 0.165; 1 < 4; p < 0.001*; 2 > 3; p < 0.001*; 2 > 4; p = 0.002*; 3 < 4; p < 0.001*
 Yes 150 (26.4) 16 (11.3) 22 (64.7) 35 (17.2) 77 (41.0)
 No 418 (73.6) 126 (88.7) 12 (35.3) 169 (82.8) 111 (59.0)
Interlimb volume >10%           1 < 2; p < 0.001*; 1:3; p = 0.604; 1 < 4; p < 0.001*; 2 > 3; p < 0.001*; 2 > 4; p = 0.001*; 3 < 4; p < 0.001*
 Yes 78 (13.7) 5 (3.5) 16 (47.1) 11 (5.4) 46 (24.5)
 No 490 (86.3) 137 (96.5) 18 (52.9) 193 (94.6) 142 (75.5)
a

Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment to control for false discovery rate.

*

Denotes statistical significance at an alpha level of 0.05.