Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 3;10(5):e02551-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02551-22

TABLE 2.

Comparison of different daptomycin regimens for a daptomycin-susceptible, dose-dependent Enterococcus faecium infective endocarditis rat model

Time from inoculation to treatment (h) Dose (mg/kg), route Bacterial load of vegetation (log10 CFUc/g) Rate of sterile vegetation Bacterial load in blood (log10 CFUc/mL) Cmaxd
(mg/L)
AUC0–24e
(mg × h/L)
No. of rats survivingj/no. treated
24 12, i.v.a 0 (0) 100 0 (0) 106.2 (56.2) 228.2 (15.7) 3/6
24 45, s.c.b 0 (0) 100 0 (0) 122.6 (17.1) 986.7 (185.6) 3/4
24 90, s.c.b 0 (0) 100 0 (0) 178.5 (19.7) 2,053.6 (352.3) 3/4
24 Control 7.91 (1.26)f 0 3.67 (0.90) 3/4
48 12, i.v.a 3.27 (0.11) 0 0 (0) 106.2 (56.2) 228.2 (15.7) 3/7
48 45, s.c.b 4.75 (0.42)g 0 0 (0) 122.6 (17.1) 986.7 (185.6) 3/6
48 90, s.c.b 0 (0)h,i 100 0 (0) 178.5 (19.7) 2,053.6 (352.3) 3/5
48 Control 9.00 (1.22) 0 5.02 (5.19) 3/6
a

i.v., intravenously.

b

s.c., subcutaneously.

c

CFU, colony forming units.

d

Cmax, maximum serum concentration.

e

AUC0–24, area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h.

f

P = 0.34, compared between 24 and 48 h from inoculation to treatment.

g

P = 0.005, compared between 45 mg/kg and the control group.

h

P < 0.001, compared between 90 mg/kg and the control group.

i

P < 0.001, compared between 90 and 45 mg/kg subcutaneously.

j

Survived the entire therapy.