Table 4.
Regression coefficient estimates for CPB and PA in the models for the overall WELL score.
| Cohort | Estimate | Std. Error | Lower CI | Upper CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contemplative Practice Behavior |
CA/Bay Area | 1.22 | 0.03 | 1.15 | 1.28 |
| New Taipei City | 1.73 | 0.05 | 1.63 | 1.83 | |
| Hangzhou | 1.16 | 0.03 | 1.10 | 1.22 | |
| Physical Activity 1 |
CA/Bay Area | 2.06 | 0.09 | 1.88 | 2.23 |
| New Taipei City | 1.07 | 0.14 | 0.79 | 1.34 | |
| Hangzhou Vigorous |
1.45 | 0.20 | 1.06 | 1.85 | |
| Hangzhou Moderate |
1.11 | 0.24 | 0.63 | 1.58 |
1 A different physical activity measure was used for the Hangzhou cohort (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) than for the SF Bay Area and New Taipei City cohorts (L-Cat 2.2), and Light physical activity was used as the reference group.