TABLE 1.
Analysis of cell morphological changes in different treatment groupsa
| Group | Thin cell walls | Asymmetry of bacterial division | Distortion of septa | Total number of cells | Percentage of defective cells (thin cell walls) (%) | Percentage of defective cells (asymmetry of bacterial division) (%) | Percentage of defective cells (distortion of septa) (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | 15 | 6 | 5 | 64 | 23.4 | 9.38 | 10.9 |
| Ceftaroline fosamil | 64 | 41 | 31 | 89 | 71.9 C | 46.1 C | 34.8 B |
| WYBQ-4 | 59 | 38 | 27 | 93 | 63.4 c | 40.9 b | 29.0 a |
Uppercase B represents a significant difference between the ceftaroline fosamil and WT groups (P < 0.01). Uppercase C represents an extremely significant difference between the ceftaroline fosamil and WT groups (P < 0.001). Lowercase a represents a significant difference between the WYBQ-4 and WT groups (P < 0.05). Lowercase b represents a significant difference between the WYBQ-4 and WT groups (P < 0.01). Lowercase c represents a significant difference between the WYBQ-4 and WT groups (P < 0.001).