Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 13;10(5):e00547-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00547-22

TABLE 1.

Analysis of cell morphological changes in different treatment groupsa

Group Thin cell walls Asymmetry of bacterial division Distortion of septa Total number of cells Percentage of defective cells (thin cell walls) (%) Percentage of defective cells (asymmetry of bacterial division) (%) Percentage of defective cells (distortion of septa) (%)
WT 15 6 5 64 23.4 9.38 10.9
Ceftaroline fosamil 64 41 31 89 71.9 C 46.1 C 34.8 B
WYBQ-4 59 38 27 93 63.4 c 40.9 b 29.0 a
a

Uppercase B represents a significant difference between the ceftaroline fosamil and WT groups (P < 0.01). Uppercase C represents an extremely significant difference between the ceftaroline fosamil and WT groups (P < 0.001). Lowercase a represents a significant difference between the WYBQ-4 and WT groups (P < 0.05). Lowercase b represents a significant difference between the WYBQ-4 and WT groups (P < 0.01). Lowercase c represents a significant difference between the WYBQ-4 and WT groups (P < 0.001).