Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 26;10(5):e01616-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01616-22

TABLE 2.

Results of microbiological cultures of control and syndromic PCR group of patients

Microbial pathogena Control group Syndromic PCR group
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus -baumanii complex 32.5% (n = 13) 10% (n = 10)
Escherichia coli 10% (n = 4) 5% (n = 5)
Klebsiella oxytoca 5% (n = 2) 1% (n = 1)
Klebsiella pneumoniae group 10% (n = 4) 5% (n = 5)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 22.5% (n = 9) 6% (n = 6)
Proteus mirabilis 7.5% (n = 3) 3% (n = 3)
Enterobacter aerogenes 2.5% (n = 1) 1% (n = 1)
Enterobacter cloacae complex 5% (n = 2) 5% (n = 5)
Haemophilus influenzae 2.5% (n = 1) 2% (n = 2)
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 7.5% (n = 3) 1% (n = 1)
Serratia marcescens 5% (n = 2) 0%
Staphylococcus aureus 12.5% (n = 5) 11% (n = 11)
Streptococcus pneumoniae 5% (n = 2) 3% (n = 3)
Candida albicans 7.5% (n = 3) 6% (n = 6)
Candida tropicalis 2.5% (n = 1) 0%
Candida parapsilosis 0% 1% (n = 1)
No pathogen identified 0% 16% (n = 16)
Negative (respiratory tract flora) 0% 21% (n = 21)
Burkolderia gladioli 0% 1% (n = 1)
Serratia rubidae 0% 1% (n = 1)
Burkolderia mallei 0% 1% (n = 1)
a

There were 3 cases of bacterial pneumonia caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Serratia, rubidiae, and Bukholderia gladioli exclusively identified by culture (the relevant targets are not included in the PCR panel). In 6 patients with pneumonia, C. albicans was identified in cultures of tracheal aspirate and considered as co-pathogen by the primary physician (target not included in the PCR panel).