Table 2.
Scale (Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)) to Analyze the Methodological Quality of Clinical Studies | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | Specified Selection Criteria | Randomization | Hidden Assignment | Similar Groups to Start | Blinded Subjects | Blinded Therapists | Blinded Raters | Outcomes 85% | Treatment or Intention to Treat | Comparison between Groups | Point Measures Variability | Outcome |
Lee et al. (2019) [24] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | 6 |
Villelabeitia-Jaureguizar et al. (2019) [25] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | 8 |
Reed et al. (2022) [26] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
Ketevian et al. (2014) [27] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9 |
Taylor et al. (2020) [28] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
Result on the PEDro scale: 9–10 (excellent), 6–8 (good), 4–5 (acceptable) and <4 (poor).