Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 20;23(20):12610. doi: 10.3390/ijms232012610

Table 1.

Respiration rates in untreated and dNs treated control and ECHS1 KO cells.

Substrate Basal
pmol O2/s/mg
Maximal
pmol O2/s/mg
Proton Leak
pmol O2/s/mg
Spare Respiratory Capacity Cell Respiratory Control Ratio
Palmitoyl-L-Carnitine CON
UT
157 ± 37 326 ± 74 65 ± 14 169 ± 38 5 ± 1
CON + dNs 917 ± 197 ** 2230 ± 93 *** 56 ± 10 1312 ± 290 *** 40 ± 2 ****
ECHS1 KO
UT
98 ± 30 * 148 ± 37 ** 67 ± 10 51 ± 13 ** 2 ± 1 **
ECHS1 KO + dNs 612 ± 336 # 1036 ± 532 # 74 ± 6 424 ± 264 # 14 ± 7 #
Glucose CON
UT
160 ± 17 891 ± 86 132 ± 28 726 ± 74 7 ± 1
CON + dNs 165 ± 49 1031 ± 97 53 ± 35 * 851 ± 75 31 ± 27
ECHS1 KO
UT
111 ± 7 *** 513 ± 16 *** 88 ± 54 404 ± 19 **** 9 ± 9
ECHS1 KO + dNs 180 ± 59 # 1065 ± 80 ### 63 ± 39 892 ± 59 #### 21 ± 11

CON, control cells; ECHS1 KO, ECHS1 KO cells; UT, untreated; dNs, deoxyribonucleosides. Spare respiratory capacity equals the maximal rate-basal rate; the Cell respiratory control ratio equals the maximal rate divided by the proton leak rate.* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p > 0.001, **** p > 0.0001 compared to untreated (ut) CON cells; # p < 0.05, ### p > 0.001, #### p > 0.0001 compared to untreated (ut) ECHS1 KO cells (Student’s two-tailed t tests).