Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 18;23(20):12486. doi: 10.3390/ijms232012486

Table 1.

Prevalence data for carbapenem-resistant Vibrio sp. worldwide.

Continent Country Sample Type Vibrio Species
(Number of Strain)
Susceptibility to Carbapenem Antibiotics Carbapenem Resistance Number of Strain (%) MIC Carbapenemase Gene Identified (Location) Year of Isolation Reference
R I S
Asia Bangladesh
Chhatak (north-eastern Bangladesh)
Clinical V. cholerae O1 (141) IMI 0 0 141
(100%)
- Absent 2009–2014 [138]
Environmental V. cholerae O1 (21) IMI 0 0 21
(100%)
- Absent
Bangladesh
Mathbaria
(south-western Bangladesh)
Clinical V. cholerae O1 (178) IMI 0 0 178
(100%)
- Absent
Environmental V. cholerae O1 (120) IMI 0 0 120
(100%)
- Absent
Bangladesh
Chhatak (north-eastern Bangladesh)
Clinical V. cholerae O1 (68) IMI 0 1
(1%)
67
(99%)
- - 2013 [139]
Environmental V. cholerae O1 (6) IMI 1
(17%)
0 5
(83%)
- -
Bangladesh
Mathbaria
(south-western Bangladesh)
Clinical
[diarrheal sample]
V. cholerae O1 (77) IMI 0 0 77
(100%)
- -
Environmental
[ponds]
V. cholerae O1 (57) IMI 0 0 57
(100%)
- -
China
[16 counties]
Clinical (429)
Environment
[water (77),
soil/surface (62)]
V. cholerae El Tor (568)
IMI 568
(100%)
0 0 - - 1986–2012 [140]
MER 57
(10%)
0 0 -
China
(Mohnarin hospitals in different areas)
Clinical V. parahaemolyticus (51) Carbapenem - - (>90%) - - 2010 [141]
China
(south-eastern China)
Clinical
[diarrheal sample]
V. parahaemolyticus (563) Carbapenem - - (>95%) - - 2015 [142]
China
[6 counties]
Clinical
[diarrheal sample]
V. parahaemolyticus (2871) IMI (<1%) - - Interpretive standard of resistance:
MIC ≥ 4 µg/mL
- 2016–2020 [118]
China
Zhejiang
Freshwater farm,
Seawater farm,
Market
V. parahaemolyticus (360) IMI
(10 µg)
- - 360 (100%) - - 2017–2019 [143]
China Seafood
[shrimp]
V. alginolyticus
Vb1394
IMI 0 1 0 2 mg/L - 2018 [144]
MER 0 1 0 2 mg/L -
China
Shenzhen
Seafood
[shrimp]
V. alginolyticus
Vb1978
IMI - - - 0.5 mg/L NDM-1, VIM-1 (plasmid;50 kb)
2019 [145]
MER - - - 0.03 mg/L
China
Bohai Bay, Tianjin
Environmental
[Coastal seawater)]
Vibrio sp. (carrying blaOXA58) IMI - - - 2 µg/mL OXA-58 (plasmid) 2019 [23]
MER - - - 8 µg/mL
China Clinical
[diarrheal sample]
Seafood
[from markets]
V. parahaemolyticus (107) Carbapenem - - (90–100%) - - 2019 [146]
China Seafood
[shrimp]
V. alginolyticus
Vb1796
IMI - - - 0.12 mg/L VMB-1 2020 [147]
MER - - - 1 mg/L
China Seafood
[shrimp]
V. alginolyticusVb1579
IMI
0 0 1 Standard agar dilution method:
(0.06 mg/L)
VAM-1 2021 [135]
MER
0 0 1 (0.12 mg/L)
China Seafood
[shrimp]
V. diabolicus
SLV18
IMI 0 0 1 - VMB-2
-
- [148]
MER - - - 4 µg/mL
(Highly resistant)
China collection center V. vulnificus - - - - - Vmh (chromosome) - [73]
India
Kolkata (east India)
Delhi (north India)
Clinical
[diarrheal sample]
V. cholerae (443) IMI ~ <20
(~ <5%)
- - - NDM-1 (chromosome) 2008–2015 [59]
India Clinical
[diarrheal sample]
V. fluvialis (115) IMI 27
(24%)
- - 4-32 µg/mL 27 (24%) NDM-1
(Class 1 integron)
27 (24%) OXA-1, OXA-7, OXA-9
2009–2013 [57]
India
Central New Delhi
Environmental [seepage,
tap water,
sewage effluent]
V. cholerae
116-14
IMI - - - 8 mg/L NDM-1 (chromosome and plasmid; 400 kb) 2010 [149]
MER - - - 8 mg/L
V. cholerae
116-17
IMI - - - 16 mg/L NDM-1
(plasmid Inc A/C;170kb)
MER - - - 1 mg/L
India
Puducherry
Clinical
[fecal sample of a child]
V. cholerae
O1 El Tor Ogawa
- - - - - NDM-1
(plasmid)
2012 [150]
India
(Southwest coast)
Environmental
[water,
sediment sample from estuary]
Vibrio sp. (180) - - - - - (13%) NDM-1 2012 [151]
Environmental
[water,
sediment sample from shrimp farms]
Vibrio sp. (70) - - - - - (14%) NDM-1
Seafood
[retail]
Vibrio sp. (30) - - - - - (7%) NDM-1
India
Kerala
Environmental [sediment,
water sample from aquaculture farm]
Seafood
[shrimp]
V. parahaemolyticus (27) MER
(10 µg)
1 8 18 - (4%) produces carbapenemase 2015–2016 [34]
Korea Seafood
[10 types]
V. parahaemolyticus IMI (70%) (13%) (17%) - - 2009 [134]
V. parahaemolyticus MER (50%) (29%) (221%) - -
Korea
Southern coast of South Korea
Environment
[mud,
tidal water]
V. parahaemolyticus (1720) MER
(10 µg)
4
(<1%)
- - 64 µg/mL
128 µg/mL
128 µg/mL
1024 µg/mL
- 2013–2014 [152]
Korea
Cheongju
Seafood
[shrimp from retail outlet]
V. parahaemolyticus (27) IMI - - - MIC50 = ≤1 mg/L;
MIC90 = ≤1 mg/L
Imipenem (range = 1–8 mg/L)
- 2016 [153]
Korea Seafood
[Cockles]
V. parahaemolyticus (4) IMI
(10 µg)
0 3
(75%)
1
(25%)
- - - [82]
V. alginolyticus (11) IMI
(10 µg)
0 3
(27%)
8
(73%)
-
V. diabolicus (14) IMI
(10 µg)
0 5
(36%)
9
(64%)
-
V. harveyi (3) IMI
(10 µg)
0 2
(67%)
1
(33%)
-
Korea Seafood
[hard shell mussel]
Total Vibrio sp. (32)
V. parahaemolyticus (2)
V. harveyi (1)
V. alginolyticus (13)
V. diabolicus (16)
IMI
(10 µg)
(3%) (3%) (94%) - 1(3%) OXA
[V. diabolicus]
- [133]
Malaysia
Selangor
Seafood
[freshwater fish]
V. parahaemolyticus (49)
V. cholerae (8)
IMI 0 0 57
(100%)
- - - [154]
Malaysia
Selangor
Seafood
[shellfish]
V. parahaemolyticus (200) IMI
(10 µg)
1
(<1%)
18
(9%)
181
(90%)
- - 2014 [29]
Malaysia Seafood
[shrimp]
V. parahaemolyticus (185) IMI
(10 µg)
4
(2%)
- - - - 2014 [30]
Seafood
[shrimp and shellfish]
V. parahaemolyticus (385) IMI
(10 µg)
5
(1%)
18
(5%)
362
(94%)
- - - [28]
Malaysia
Selangor
Seafood
[marine and freshwater fish]
V. parahaemolyticus (165) IMI
(10 µg)
19
(12%)
6
(4%)
140
(85%)
- - 2016 [27]
Malaysia
Selangor
Seafood [shrimps,
clams, squid]
V. parahaemolyticus (120) IMI
(10 µg)
0 2
(2%)
118
(98%)
- - 2018 [123]
MER
(10 µg)
0 2
(2%)
118
(98%)
-
Malaysia
Selangor
Seafood
[shellfish]
V. parahaemolyticus (43) IMI
(10 µg)
10
(23%)
0 33
(77%)
- - - [32]
Singapore Environment [harbor,
ballast water from ships]
V. alginolyticus MER 3 - - - - 2016 [84]
V. parahaemolyticus MER 2 - - - -
V. vulnificus MER 6 - - - -
V. brasiliensis MER 1 - - - -
V. campbellii MER 18 - - - -
V. rotiferianus MER 1 - - - -
V. tubiashii MER 1 - - - -
Vietnam
(Southern Vietnam)
Environmental V. cholerae (100)
non-O1, non-O139
- - - - - 3 (3%) NDM-1 2010–2013 [155]
Oceania Australia
Northern territory
Clinical
[infection site]
Vibrio sp. (44) MER - - (93%) - - 2000–2013 [156]
Africa Egypt
Mansoura
Seafood
[fish and shellfish]
V. parahaemolyticus (50)
IMI
(10 µg)
12
(24%)
4
(8%)
34
(68%)
- - - [75]
V. alginolyticus (42) IMI
(10 µg)
8
(19%)
10
(24%)
24
(57%)
- -
Nigeria
(South-south Nigeria)
Seafood
[shellfish]
Vibrio sp. (6) IMI
(10 µg)
6
(100%)
0 0 - - 2015–2017 [121]
Nigeria
(Eight states in Southern Nigeria)
African salad V. parahaemolyticus (63) IMI
(10 µg)
2
(3%)
7
(11%)
54
(86%)
- - 2018–2019 [132]
Nigeria
Lagos
Environment
[sea water,
wet and dry sand]
V. parahaemolyticus (26) IMI (4%) - - - 1 (4%) NDM-1 - [60]
MER (4%) - - - -
ETP (4%) - - - -
V. vulnificus (14) IMI (57%) - - - 5 (36%) NDM-1
MER (57%) - - - -
ETP (57%) - - - -
South Africa
[Chris Hani,
Amahlathi,
Lukhanji]
Environment
[Final effluents from dams,
earth canals,
rivers,
receiving water bodies,
tap water and
wastewater treatment units]
V. cholerae (61) IMI
(10 µg)
0 2
(3%)
59
(97%)
- 19 (31%) NDM-1, GES, IMP, VIM
14 (23%) produce carbapenemase
2018 [157]
MER
(10 µg)
0 0 61
(100%)
-
ETP
(10 µg)
5
(8%)
3
(5%)
53
(87%)
-
DOR
(10 µg)
1
(2%)
2
(3%)
59
(97%)
-
South Africa
[Eastern Cape]
Environment
[wastewater effluent]
Total Vibrio sp. (52)
V. parhaemolyticus (12)
V. vulnificus (18)
V. fluvialis (19)
V. metschnikovii (3)
IMI
(10 µg)
MER
(10 µg)
0 0 52
(100%)
- - 2010 [158]
South Africa
[Eastern Cape]
Environment
[river water]
Total Vibrio sp. (118) IMI
(10 µg)
39
(33%)
40
(34%)
39
(33%)
- 35(30%) VIM,
13 (11%) OXA-48,
18 (15%) IMP, 20 (17%) GES, 7 (6%) KPC
2018 [131]
MER
(10 µg)
32
(27%)
21
(18%)
65
(55%)
- -
V. mimicus (40) IMI
(10 µg)
2
(5%)
17
(43%)
21
(53%)
- -
MER
(10 µg)
7
(18%)
8
(20%)
25
(63%)
- -
V. vulnificus (37) IMI
(10 µg)
26
(70%)
10
(27%)
1
(3%)
- -
MER
(10 µg)
17
(46%)
7
(19%)
13
(35%)
- -
V. fluvialis (41) IMI
(10 µg)
11
(27%)
13
(32%)
17
(41%)
- -
MER
(10 µg)
8
(20%)
6
(15%)
27
(66%)
- -
Uganda
(South-western district)
Environmental [surface water] Vibrio sp. (392) MER
(10 µg)
180
(46%)
38
(10%)
174
(44%)
- - 2019 [159]
Europe Italy
[Northern Sardinia]
Environmental [water sample from coast and gulf] V. alginolyticus (40) IMI
(10 µg)
- - - MIC50 = 0.06 mg/L;
MIC90 = 0.12 mg/L
Imipenem
(range = 0.06–2 mg/L)
- - [85]
MER
(10 µg)
- - - MIC50 = 0.06 mg/L;
MIC90 = 0.06 mg/L
Meropenem (range = 0.03–0.25 mg/L)
-
V. parahaemolyticus (8) IMI
(10 µg)
- - - MIC50 = 0.125 mg/L;
MIC90 = 1 mg/L
Imipenem
(range = 0.06–1 mg/L)
-
MER
(10 µg)
- - - MIC50 = 0.006 mg/L;
MIC90 = 0.12mg/L
Meropenem (range = 0.004–0.12 mg/L)
-
V. vulnificus (6) IMI
(10 µg)
- - - MIC50 = 0.12 mg/L;
MIC90 = 0.12 mg/L
Imipenem
(range = 0.06–2 mg/L)
-
MER
(10 µg)
- - - MIC50 = 0.006 mg/L;
MIC90 = 0.12mg/L
Meropenem (range = 0.004–0.25 mg/L)
-
Italy Environmental [Seawater] V. cholerae (12) MER
(10 µg)
0 6
(50%)
6
(50%)
- - 2003–2014 [160]
Environmental [Freshwater] V. cholerae (5) MER
(10 µg)
0 1
(20%)
4
(80%)
- -
Seafood V. cholerae (25) MER
(10 µg)
1
(4%)
4
(16%)
20
(80%)
- -
Italy
(north-western Adriatic Sea coasts)
Seafood
[European Seabass]
V. anguillarum
28AD
IMI
(10 µg)
0 0 1 4 µg/mL - 2007–2011 [161]
Environmental [Water from Celeri Lagoon] V. parahaemolyticus
VPE116
IMI
(10 µg)
0 0 1 0.125 µg/mL -
Italy (north-western Adriatic Sea coasts) Seafood
[shellfish]
Wildlife
[turtle blood]
Environmental [beach, brackish water]
V. vulnificus (40) IMI
(10 µg)
0 0 40
(100%)
- - - [162]
MER
(10 µg)
0 0 40
(100%)
-
France
Port-Saint-Louis
Wildlife
[gull]
V. cholerae
non-O1/non-O139
IMI - - - 3 mg/L VIM-1, VIM-4
(plasmid)
2013 [163]
MER - - - 0.5 mg/L
ETP - - - 0.19 mg/L
DOR - - - 0.75 mg/L
France
(imported)
Seafood
[shrimp]
V. parahaemolyticus IMI 0 0 (100%) - NDM-1
Produces carbapenemase
2016 [74]
Germany
[Baltic Sea,
the North Sea,
Ems and Weser River estuaries]
Total (184) V. cholerae
V. vulnificus
IMI
(10 µg)
(2%) (1%) (97%) - - 2004–2014 [21]
MER
(10 µg)
(<1%) (2%) (98%)
Retail (35) V. cholerae
V. vulnificus
IMI
(10 µg)
0 0 (100%) - -
MER
(10 µg)
0 0 (100%)
Clinical (18) V. cholerae
V. vulnificus
IMI
(10 µg)
0 0 (100%) - -
MER
(10 µg)
0 0 (100%)
Environmental (131) V. cholerae
V. vulnificus
IMI
(10 µg)
(3%) (2%) (95%) - -
MER
(10 µg)
(1%) (2%) (97%)
North Sea (52) V. cholerae
V. vulnificus
IMI
(10 µg)
(6%) 0 (94%) - -
MER
(10 µg)
(2%) (4%) (94%)
Baltic Sea (79) V. cholerae
V. vulnificus
IMI
(10 µg)
(1%) (3%) (96%) - -
MER
(10 µg)
0 (1%) (99%)
Germany
[Baltic Sea,
the North Sea]
Environmental
[Coastal water]
V. cholerae (4) IMI
MER
4
(100%)
0 0 - 3 VCC-1 - [130]
Norway
[temperate and Polar Oceanic area]
Environmental [Seawater,
sea creatures]
V. alginolyticus (53) IMI
(10 µg)
0 2
(4%)
51
(96%)
2–8 µg/mL - 2018 [83]
MER
(10 µg)
0 0 53
(100%)
-
V. anguillarum (21) IMI
(10 µg)
21 (100%) 0 0 - -
MER
(10 µg)
0 0 21 (100%) -
V. antiquaries (2) IMI
(10 µg)
MER
(10 µg)
0 0 2 (100%) - -
V. fujianensis (2) IMI
(10 µg)
0 1
(50%)
1
(50%)
- -
MER
(10 µg)
0 0 2 (100%) -
V. metschnovikovii (38) IMI
(10 µg)
MER
(10 µg)
0 0 38(100%) - -
Slovakia
(Eastern and southern)
Environmental [freshwater] V. cholerae (21) IMI
(10 µg)
0 8
(38%)
13
(62%)
- - 2016 [70]
Spain Clinical
[leg ulcer]
V. metschnikovii IMI 0 0 1 <1 µg/mL - 2008 [164]
UK Clinical
[blood sample of a burn patient]
V. cholerae MER 1 0 0 - NDM-1 2011 [165]
South America Brazil Seafood
[shrimp]
Vibrio (26) IMI
(10 µg)
[in seawater]
1
(4%)
[V. navarrensis]
0 25
(96%)
- - - [81]
IMI
(10 µg)
[in distilled water]
0 0 26
(100%)
-
Brazil
Guanabara Bay
Environment
[water sample from polluted estuary]
V. parahaemolyticus (150) IMI 1
(<1%)
2
(1%)
147
(99%)
- - 2018–2019 [20]
Environment
[water sample from polluted estuary]
V. alginolyticus (1) IMI 1 0 0 - -
Ecuador
Cuenca
Seafood
[shrimp]
V. parahaemolyticus (154) IMI
(10 µg)
(<1%) 0 (99%) - - 2012 [122]
MER 0 0 (100%) - -
North America Maryland Coastal Bays,
Chesapeake Bay
Environmental [Surface water] V. parahaemolyticus (77) IMI 0 0 77
(100%)
(IMI; 2–16 µg/mL) - 2009 [166]
MER 0 0 77
(100%)
(MERO; 2–16 µg/mL)
V. vulnificus (120) IMI
(10 µg)
2(2%) 0 118
(98%)
- -
MER
(10 µg)
0 0 120
(100%)
-
Canada
(imported)
Seafood
[shrimp; imported from India]
V. cholerae DOR,
ETP,
IMI,
MER
1 0 0 >32 µg/mL VCC-1
(plasmid)
2014 [31]
- - Culture collection center V. cholerae (20) IMI
(10 µg)
- - - MIC50 = 0.25 µg/mL;
MIC90 =
0.25 µg/mL
Imipenem
(range = 0.0–0.5 µg/mL)
- - [51]
MER
(10 µg)
- - - MIC50 =
2 mg/L;
MIC90 =
2 mg/L
Meropenem (range = 1–2 mg/L)
V. parahaemolyticus (20) IMI
(10 µg)
- - - MIC50 = 0.06 µg/mL;
MIC90 =
0.06 µg/mL
Imipenem
(range = 0.06 µg/mL)
-
MER
(10 µg)
- - - MIC50 =
0.06 mg/L
MIC90 = 0.5mg/L
Meropenem (range = 0.06–0.5 mg/L)
V. vulnificus (20) IMI
(10 µg)
- - - MIC50 = 0.06 µg/mL
Imipenem
(range = 0.06 µg/mL)
-
MER
(10 µg)
- - - MIC50 = 1.12 mg/L;
MIC90 =
0.25 mg/L
Meropenem
(range = 0.06–0.25 mg/L)

R: resistance, I: intermediately resistant; S: susceptible; IMI: imipenem; MER: meropenem; ETP: ertapenem; DOR: doripenem; GES: Guiana extended-spectrum; IMP: Imipenemase MBL; active-on-imipenem; KPC: K. pneumoniae carbapenemase; NDM: New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase; OXA: Oxacillinases; VAM: Vibrio alginolyticus MBL; VIM: Verona integron-encoded MBL; VMB: Vibrio MBL; Vmh: MBL fold metallohydrolase.