Table 3.

Ordinal logistic regression analysis results.

Variable			Model 1: How likely are you to recommend video or phone visits to a friend on a scale of 1 to 10? (1 = would not recommend and 10 = would highly recommend)a (n=255)				Model 2: To what degree did the video or phone visit help you with the health issue for which you needed the appointment?b (n=268)
			ORc (95% CI)		P value		OR (95% CI)		P value
Ethnicity (reference: White)
	Non-White	0.52 (0.28-0.99)		.047		0.87 (0.42-1.77)		.69
	Prefer not to answer	1.19 (0.35-4.12)		.78		1.33 (0.33-5.39)		.69
Family income (reference: $150,000 CAD or more)
	0 to 29,999	3.28 (0.63-17.09)		.16		1.56 (0.28-8.61)		.61
	30,000 to 59,999	0.62 (0.21-1.84)		.39		0.51 (0.15-1.72)		.28
	60,000 to 89,999	0.52 (0.19-1.45)		.21		0.74 (0.24-2.33)		.61
	90,000 to 119,000	0.67 (0.25-1.76)		.42		0.38 (0.13-1.09)		.07
	120,000 to 149,999	1.16 (0.26-5.20)		.84		0.42 (0.10-1.81)		.25
	Do not know	1.53 (0.44-5.29)		.50		0.60 (0.17-2.14)		.44
	Prefer not to answer	0.52 (0.23-1.15)		.11		0.65 (0.26-1.64)		.36
Gender (reference: Male)
	Female	0.99 (0.48-2.04)		.98		1.70 (0.81-3.58)		.16
Overall marginalization (reference: Not marginalized)
	Marginalized	1.87 (0.78-4.49)		.16		2.15 (0.78-5.89)		.14
Age group (years; reference: 30-39)
	0-18	0.32 (0.05-1.92)		.21		1.29 (0.15-11.28)		.82
	19-29	0.63 (0.26-1.54)		.31		0.76 (0.29-1.99)		.57
	40-49	0.73 (0.34-1.58)		.42		0.72 (0.31-1.71)		.46
	50-59	0.26 (0.11-0.64)		.003		0.53 (0.20-1.40)		.20
	60-69	1.19 (0.39-3.63)		.76		1.30 (0.39-4.35)		.67
	≥70	0.95 (0.33-2.75)		.92		0.83 (0.28-2.41)		.73

^aOutcome categories: “1-6,” “7-8,” “9-10.”

^bOutcome categories: “not helpful or neutral,” “somewhat helpful,” “very helpful.”

^cOR: odds ratio.