Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 1;8(10):1042. doi: 10.3390/jof8101042

Table 2.

The morphological comparisons of new Talaromyces species and their closely related species.

Species CYA
mm
MEA
mm
YES
mm
Conidiophore Conidia
Shape
Conidia
Wall
Conidia
Size-μm
Source
T. santanderensis 22–24 34–36 26–30 Mono-to
biverticillate
Slightly globose Smooth 1.8–2.2 Cocoa soil, Santander,
Colombia
T. pinophilus a 16–31 37–45 12–35 Biverticillate, occasionally monoverticillate Subglobose to ellipsoidal Smooth to finely
roughened
2.5–3.5
(−9)
×2.5–3.0
(−5)
PVC, France
T. adpressus b 32–33 42–43 42–43 Biverticillate Subglobose to ellipsoidal Smooth 2.5–4.5
(−4.5) × 2–3.5
Indoor environments in Beijing China
T. lentulus c 26–27 43–44 37–38 Biverticillate Globose Smooth 2.5–3.0 Alkaline soil, Yingkou, Shandong, China
T. pratensis d 20–22 34–36 NI Biverticillate, occasionally monoverticillate Globose to subglobose, occasionally broadly ellipsoidal Smooth to finely roughened walls 2.5–3.0
(−7)×
2.5–3.5
(−4.5)
Effluent of water treatment plant Cincinnati, W. B.
T. soli d 20–26 37–42 Biverticillate rarely monoverticillate Subglobose to broadly ellipsoidal Thick, to finely roughened 2.5–3.5
(−5.5) × 2.5–3.5 (−4.5)
Isolated from soil.
T. tumuli d 19–27 36–42 Biverticillate rarely monoverticillate Subglobose to broadly
ellipsoidal
Smooth to finely roughened walls 2.5–3.5 (−7) 2.5–3.5 (−4.5) Isolated from soil from the
big bluestem prairie

a From the description by Houbraken et al. [43] and Fujii et al. [44]. b From the description by Chen et al. [45]. c From the description by Jiang et al. [46]. d From the description by Peterson & Jurjević [30]. NI: No information.