Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 26;10(10):e1505–e1513. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00312-6

Table 2.

Background characteristics of participating post-abortion care providers before study start

Midwife group Physician group Total p value
Age, years
Number of post-abortion care providers 138 31 169* ..
Mean (SD) 38·1 (9·7) 36·4 (9·2) 37·8 (9·6) 0·38
Median (IQR) 39 (29–45) 34 (29–40) 38 (29–45) ..
Sex .. .. .. <0·0001
Number of post-abortion care providers 139 33 172 ..
Female 135 (97%) 6 (18%) 141 (82%) ..
Male 4 (3%) 27 (82%) 31 (18%) ..
Number of in–service post-abortion care trainings
Number of post-abortion care providers 111 24 135§ ..
Median (IQR) 1 (0–1) 1 (0–2) 1 (0–2) 0·16
Confidence in using misoprostol .. .. .. 0·29
Number of post-abortion care providers 135 33 168 ..
Yes 126 (93%) 29 (88%) 155 (92%) ..
Confidence in using manual vacuum aspiration .. .. .. <0·0001
Number of post-abortion care providers 130 33 163** ..
Yes 63 (48%) 30 (91%) 93 (57%) ..

Data are n (%) unless stated otherwise. 174 of 183 post-abortion care providers completed the questionnaire; two were clinical officers, and not part of the randomisation groups. Therefore, the analytical sample was 172.

*

One provider in the midwife group and two providers in the physician group were missing data for age.

Student's t–test.

χ2 test.

§

28 providers in the midwife group and nine providers in the midwife group were missing data for confidence using manual vacuum aspiration.

Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Four providers in the midwife group were missing data for confidence using misoprostol.

**

Nine providers in the midwife group were missing data for confidence using manual vacuum aspiration.