Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 12;24(11):1541–1548. doi: 10.1007/s11912-022-01317-w

Table 1.

Ongoing clinical trials for conservative surgery for early-stage, low-risk cervical cancer

Trial name Objective Trial design Inclusion criteria Study arms Status
ConCerv (NCT01048853) [20] Evaluate the feasibility of conservative surgery in women with early-stage, low-risk cervical cancer Prospective, single-arm, multicenter

• FIGO 2009 stages IA2–IB1 cervical carcinoma

• Squamous or adenocarcinoma histology

• Tumor size ≤ 2 cm

• No LVSI

• Depth of invasion ≤ 10 mm

• Negative imaging for metastatic disease

• Negative cone margins

• Conization followed by nodal assessment (fertility preservation)

• Conization followed by simple hyst + nodal assessment

• “Inadvertent” simple hyst + nodal dissection

Completed and published
GOG 278 (NCT01649089) [42] Study the physical function and quality-of-life before and after surgery in patients with stage I cervical cancer Prospective cohort

• Stages IA1–IB1 disease

• Squamous, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous histology

• Tumor size ≤ 2 cm

• Depth of invasion on diagnostic path ≤ 10 mm

• No evidence of metastasis on imaging

• Cone biopsy and pelvic lymphadenectomy

• Simple hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy

Recruiting
SHAPE (NCT01658930) [25] Compare pelvic relapse-free survival in patients undergoing simple vs. radical hysterectomy Randomized clinical trial

• FIGO 2009 stages IA2–IB1

• Adenocarcinoma, squamous, or adenosquamous histology

• Tumor size ≤ 2 cm

• Depth of invasion ≤ 10 mm or < 50% on MRI

• No desire for future fertility

• Radical hysterectomy + pelvic lymph node dissection

• Simple hysterectomy + pelvic lymph node dissection

Completed enrollment
CONTESSA (NCT04016389) [41] Evaluate the safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery Multicenter, prospective, single-arm, phase II trial

• FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer with lesions measuring 2–4 cm

• Lesion size assessed by pelvic MRI and physical exam

• Squamous, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous histology

• LVSI allowed

• Pelvic lymph node dissection ± sentinel lymph node mapping to exclude node-positive patients

• All participants will receive neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, followed by assessment for response

• If responded, undergo trachelectomy

• If failed to respond, receive adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy or have a hysterectomy

Recruiting
IRTA [34] Compare 4.5-year disease-free survival after open vs. minimally invasive radical trachelectomy Multicenter, retrospective

• Squamous, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous histology

• Tumor size ≤ 2 cm

• Underwent open or minimally invasive (robot or laparoscopic) radical trachelectomy with nodal assessment (pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or sentinel lymph node biopsy)

• Open radical trachelectomy

• Minimally invasive radical trachelectomy (laparoscopic or robotic)

Completed and published
PHENIX/CSEM 010 (NCT02642471) [30] Compare oncological outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with and without sentinel node metastasis Multicenter, randomized control trial

• Patient age 18–65 years

• Histologically confirmed, untreated stages IA1–IB2 cervical squamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma

• All patients will undergo sentinel node biopsy at the start of surgery, which will be sent for frozen section, and then patients are triaged to PHENIX-1 (node negative) or PHENIX-II (node positive)

• Within each cohort, randomized in 1:1 ratio of sentinel nodes alone or pelvic lymphadenectomy

• Radical hysterectomy performed for all patients

Recruiting