Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 5;54(12):3087–3095. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03350-x

Table 2.

Embryologic outcomes of male patients with TESA or PESA

TESA (n = 240) Non-inflammatory PESA (n = 401) Inflammatory PESA (n = 158) P value
Oocytes retrieved < 5, % (n) 7.50 (18/240) 8.73 (35/401) 8.86 (14/158) 0.838b
Oocytes retrieved 11 (8, 15) 12 (8, 16) 12 (8, 16) 0.092a
Metaphase II oocytes 10 (7, 12) 10 (7, 13) 10 (7, 13) 0.286a
Fertilized oocytes (2PN) 7 (5, 9) 7 (5, 10) 7 (4.5, 10) 0.264a
FR, % (n) 72.19 (1659/2298) 72.25 (2927/4051) 73.83 (1179/1597) 0.442b
2PN cleavage zygotes 7 (4.75, 9) 7 (5, 10) 7 (4.5, 10) 0.273a
2PNCR, % (n) 99.16 (1645/1659) 99.49 (2912/2927) 99.32 (1171/1179) 0.396b
High-quality embryoc,d 3 (2, 5) 4 (2, 6) 4 (2, 6) 0.004a
HQER, % (n)c,d 49.43 (820/1659) 56.03 (1640/2927) 55.39 (653/1179)  < 0.001b

Results are presented as the median and interquartile ranges, or % (n)

TESA testicular sperm aspiration, PESA percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration, ANOVA analysis of variance, FR fertilization rate, 2PNCR 2PN cleavage rate, HQER high-quality embryo rate

P values in bold are statistically significant (<0.05)

aOne-way ANOVA

bPearson Chi-square test

cStatistically significant differences between TESA and non-inflammatory PESA

dStatistically significant differences between TESA and inflammatory PESA