Table 8.
Examples of photocatalytic cellulose materials for degradation of MB and MO in recent years
| Catalyst type | Pollutant | Performance | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ag/ZnO cotton fabric | MB, 20 mg L−1, 40 mL | 120 min, 90%, UV–vis | Ibanescu et al. (2014) |
| GO/TiO2 cotton fabric | MB, 10 mg L−1, 100 mL | 4 days, 90%, visible | Karimi et al. (2016) |
| TiO2 cotton fabric | MB, 10 mg L−1, 100 mL | 14 h, 90%, UV–vis | Cheng et al. (2018) |
| Ag/AgCl/ZIF-8/TiO2 cotton fabric | MB, 20 mg L−1, 50 mL | 105 min, 98.5%, visible | Guan et al. (2019) |
| Ag@AgCl-reinforced cellulose composites | MB, 15 mg L−1, 50 mL | 60min, 99%, UV–vis | Dong et al. (2021) |
| 0.1Ce-Ti/Cf | MB, 100 mg L−1, 10 mL | 120 min, 91.8%, sunlight | This work |
| 0.3 Ce-Ti/Cf | MB, 100 mg L−1, 10 mL | 120 min, 92.3%, sunlight | This work |
| 0.5 Ce-Ti/Cf | MB, 100 mg L−1, 10 mL | 120 min, 94%, sunlight | This work |
| C-T/CA fiber | MO, 40 mg L−1, 20 mL | 60min, 98%, UV–vis | Shi et al. (2019) |
| CA/ZnO -0.4 | MO, 20 mg L−1, 100 mL | 90min, 94.71%, UV–vis | Hasanpour et al. (2021) |
| H4SiW12O40 (SiW12)/cellulose acetate (CA) | MO, 10 mg L−1, 100 mL | 120min, 94.6%, UV–vis | Li et al. (2017) |
| TiO2 templated by NFC | MO, 5 mg L−1, 100 mL | 120min, 100%, UV–vis | Xiao et al. (2017) |
| BC/PDA/TiO2 fabric | MO, 20 mg L−1, 20 mL | 30min, 95.1%, UV–vis | Yang et al. (2020) |
| TiO2/cellulose fabric | MO, 30 mg L−1, 25 mL | 100min, 99.5%, UV–vis | Chu et al. (2019) |
| 0.1Ce-Ti/Cf | MO, 100 mg L−1, 10 mL | 60 min, 97%, sunlight | This work |
| 0.3 Ce-Ti/Cf | MO, 100 mg L−1, 10 mL | 60 min, 98.5%, sunlight | This work |
| 0.5 Ce-Ti/Cf | MO, 100 mg L−1, 10 mL | 60 min, 98.9%, sunlight | This work |