Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 21;31(11):818–830. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013785

Table 3.

Comparing proportion of total audits with activated pre-MET, MET or CAT call and escalation per hospital policy by intervention and control groups at T0, T1 and T2

Group Time 0 Time 1 Time 1 vs Time 0* Time 2 Time 2 vs Time 0* P value†
n/N (%) n/N (%) OR (95% CI) n/N (%) OR (95% CI)
Proportion of audits with escalation of care to pre-MET, MET or CAT as per hospital policy (N=2680)‡
Both 197/848 (23.2%) 247/874 (28.3%) 1.30 (1.05 to 1.62) 279/958 (29.0%) 1.35 (1.09 to 1.67)
Intervention 82/439 (18.8%) 107/424 (25.2%) 1.47 (1.06 to 2.04) 110/470 (23.2%) 1.32 (0.96 to 1.82) 0.102
Control 115/409 (28.1%) 140/450 (31.1%) 1.15 (0.86 to 1.55) 169/488 (34.6%) 1.35 (1.02 to 1.80) 0.055
Time 1 vs Time 0§
OR (99% CI)
Time 2 vs Time 0§
OR (99% CI)
1.24 (0.69 to 2.30) 0.92 (0.51 to 1.65)
p=0.355 p=0.735
Proportion of audits with pre-MET triggers where pre-MET was activated (N=2403)
Both 168/753 (22.3%) 213/778 (27.4%) 1.31 (1.04 to 1.66) 251/872 (28.8%) 1.41 (1.12 to 1.77)
Intervention 66/387 (17.1%) 90/376 (23.9%) 1.53 (1.07 to 2.19) 96/425 (22.6%) 1.42 (1.00 to 2.02) 0.057
Control 102/366 (27.9%) 123/402 (30.6%) 1.14 (0.84 to 1.56) 155/447 (34.7%) 1.37 (1.02 to 1.86) 0.055
Time 1 vs Time 0§
OR (99% CI)
Time 2 vs Time 0§
OR (99% CI)
1.29 (0.68 to 2.45) 0.96 (0.52 to 1.88)
p=0.311 p=0.871
Proportion of audits with MET triggers where MET was activated (N=273)
Both 29/95 (30.5%) 32/94 (34.0%) 1.17 (0.64 to 2.17) 26/84 (31.0%) 1.02 (0.54 to 1.94)
Intervention 16/52 (30.8%) 17/48 (35.4%) 1.23 (0.53 to 2.87) 12/43 (27.9%) 0.87 (0.35 to 2.14) 0.791
Control 13/43 (30.2%) 15/46 (32.6%) 1.11 (0.45 to 2.78) 14/41 (34.1%) 1.19 (0.47 to 3.04) 0.707
Time 1 vs Time 0§
OR (99% CI)
Time 2 vs Time 0§
OR (99% CI)
1.11 (0.22 to 5.63) 0.78 (0.15 to 4.16)
p=0.873 p=0.704

*OR (95% CI) compares within-group difference across times in each study group.

†P value for trend tests the changes in the outcome across times (T0, T1 and T2) in each study group.

‡Number of CATs identified in audits were too small to analyse separately.

§Intervention effect: OR (99% CI) comparing changes over time from T0 between intervention and control at Time 1 and Time 2.

CAT, cardiac arrest team; MET, medical emergency team.