Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 21;31(11):818–830. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013785

Table 4.

Comparing proportions of total audits (N=10 383) with nursing interventions by intervention and control groups at T0, T1 and T2

Group Time 0 Time 1 Time 1 vs Time 0 * Time 2 Time 2 vs Time 0 * P value†
n/N (%) n/N (%) OR (95% CI) n/N (%) OR (95% CI)
Proportion of audits with at least one vital sign measurement every 8 hours
Both 3072/3370 (91.2%) 3236/3535 (91.5%) 1.05 (0.89 to 1.24) 3206/3478 (92.2%) 1.14 (0.96 to 1.36)
Intervention 1537/1716 (89.6%) 1611/1778 (90.6%) 1.12 (0.90 to 1.40) 1609/1747 (92.1%) 1.36 (1.08 to 1.72) 0.010
Control 1535/1654 (92.8%) 1625/1757 (92.5%) 0.95 (0.74 to 1.23) 1597/1731 (92.3%) 0.92 (0.71 to 1.19) 0.689
Time 1 vs Time 0
OR (95% CI)‡
Time 2 vs Time 0
OR (95% CI)‡
1.14 (0.79 to 1.65) 1.43 (0.98 to 2.09)
p=0.471 p=0.064
Proportion of audits with a complete set of vital sign measurements every 8hours
Both 2782/3370 (82.6%) 2930/3535 (82.9%) 1.02 (0.90 to 1.16) 2919/3478 (83.9%) 1.10 (0.97 to 1.25)
Intervention 1418/1716 (82.6%) 1483/1778 (83.4%) 1.06 (0.89 to 1.26) 1491/1747 (85.3%) 1.22 (1.02 to 1.47) 0.034
Control 1364/1654 (82.5%) 1447/1757 (82.4%) 0.99 (0.83 o 1.18) 1428/1731 (82.5%) 1.00 (0.84 to 1.20) 0.912
Time 1 vs Time 0
OR (95% CI)‡
Time 2 vs Time 0
OR (95% CI)‡
1.06 (0.80 to 1.39) 1.23 (0.93 to 1.63)
p=0.697 p=0.154
Proportion of audits with repeated measurement in 30 min after at least one abnormal vital sign
Both 51/845 (6.0%) 60/861 (7.0%) 1.17 (0.79 to 1.72) 32/909 (3.5%) 0.57 (0.36 to 0.89)
Intervention 22/437 (5.0%) 33/416 (7.9%) 1.62 (0.93 to 2.87) 14/452 (3.1%) 0.61 (0.30 to 1.19) 0.169
Control 29/408 (7.1%) 27/445 (6.1%) 0.84 (0.49 to 1.46) 18/457 (3.9%) 0.54 (0.29 to 0.98) 0.109
Time 1 vs Time 0
OR (95% CI)‡
Time 2 vs Time 0
OR (95% CI)‡
1.71 (0.81 to 3.62) 0.97 (0.39 to 2.40)
p=0.158 p=0.947
Proportion of audits with nursing intervention documented after triggering pre-MET or MET
Both 271/845 (32.1%) 290/861 (33.7%) 1.08 (0.88 to 1.32) 273/909 (30.0%) 0.91 (0.74 to 1.11)
Intervention 144/437 (33.0%) 152/416 (36.5%) 1.17 (0.88 to 1.55) 130/452 (28.8%) 0.82 (0.62 to 1.09) 0.197
Control 127/408 (31.1%) 138/445 (31.0%) 0.99 (0.74 to 1.33) 143/457 (31.3%) 1.01 (0.76 to 1.35) 0.958
Time 1 vs Time 0
OR (95% CI)‡
Time 2 vs Time 0
OR (95% CI)‡
1.17 (0.77 to 1.79) 0.81 (0.53 to 1.23)
p=0.465 p=0.320
Proportion of audits with medical team review in 60 min of triggering pre-MET or MET
Both 63/845 (7.5%) 65/861 (7.5%) 1.01 (0.71 to 1.46) 78/909 (8.6%) 1.16 (0.82 to 1.65)
Intervention 24/437 (5.5%) 32/416 (7.7%) 1.43 (0.83 to 2.50) 30/452 (6.6%) 1.22 (0.70 to 2.15) 0.471
Control 39/408 (9.6%) 33/445 (7.4%) 0.76 (0.46 to 1.23) 48/457 (10.5%) 1.11 (0.71 to 1.74) 0.606
Time 1 vs Time 0
OR (95% CI)‡
Time 2 vs Time 0
OR (95% CI)‡
1.75 (0.82 to 3.73) 1.05 (0.50 to 2.21)
p=0.144 p=0.890

*OR (95% CI) compares within-group difference across follow-ups.

†P value for trend tests the changes in the outcome across time points (T0, T1 and T2) in each study group.

‡Intervention effect: OR (95% CI) comparing changes over time from T0 between intervention and control at Time 1 and Time 2.