Table 3.
Studies | Solberg et al. (28) | Moss and Adams (29) | Southwell et al. (30) | Schroeder et al. (31) | Stockstill and Callahan (35) | Zach and Andreasen (57) | Curran et al. (36) | Jones et al. (37) | Sirirungrojying et al. (38) | Velly et al. (39) | Manfredini et al. (40) | Pallegama et al. (41) | Saheeb and Otakpor (42) | Vedolin et al. (45) | Giannakopoulos et al. (8) | Lajnert et al. (46) | Schmidt et al. (54) | Reissmann et al. (17) | Staniszewski et al. (56) | Bastos et al. (5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selection | Case definition adequate | * | – | – | * | – | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | – | * | * | * |
Representativeness of the cases | – | – | – | – | – | * | – | * | – | – | – | – | – | * | – | – | – | * | * | – | |
Selection of controls | * | * | * | – | * | * | * | * | * | * | – | * | * | * | * | – | * | – | * | * | |
Definition of controls | * | * | – | – | * | * | – | – | – | * | * | * | * | * | * | – | * | – | * | – | |
Comparability | * | * | * | * | ** | * | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | * | * | * | * | * | ** | * | |
Exposure | Ascertainment of exposure | * | – | – | – | – | – | * | – | – | * | * | – | – | * | – | – | – | – | * | – |
Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | |
Non–Response rate | – | – | – | – | * | * | – | – | – | * | – | – | – | – | * | – | * | * | * | – | |
Quality | GOOD | POOR | POOR | POOR | FAIR | GOOD | FAIR | FAIR | GOOD | POOR | GOOD | FAIR | FAIR | GOOD | GOOD | POOR | FAIR | POOR | GOOD | POOR |
The number of * symbol indicates the number of points assigned to a given parameter.