Table 3.
Predictors of conditional wealth for Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey 1983–2009 (n = 1581)
| Year | 1991 | 1994 | 1998 | 2002 | 2005 | 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal schooling (y) |
0.04 (0.03, 0.05) |
0.01 (0, 0.01) |
0.01 (0, 0.02) |
0 (-0.01, 0.01) |
0.01 (0, 0.02) |
0 (-0.01, 0.01) |
| Maternal age (y) |
0 (-0.01, 0.01) |
-0.01 (-0.01, 0) |
0 (-0.01, 0) |
0 (-0.01, 0) |
0 (-0.01, 0) |
0 (0, 0.01) |
| Birth order |
0.02 (-0.02, 0.05) |
0.03 (0.01, 0.06) |
0.02 (-0.01, 0.04) |
0.01 (-0.01, 0.04) |
0.01 (-0.02, 0.04) |
-0.02 (-0.04, 0.01) |
| Male |
0.02 (-0.04, 0.08) |
-0.01 (-0.05, 0.03) |
0.09 (0.04, 0.13) |
-0.07 (-0.11, -0.02) |
0 (-0.04, 0.05) |
-0.16 (-0.21, -0.11) |
| Rural in 1983 |
0 (-0.19, 0.19) |
-0.13 (-0.26, 0.01) |
0.08 (-0.07, 0.22) |
0.17 (0.03, 0.3) |
0.02 (-0.12, 0.17) |
0.02 (-0.13, 0.17) |
| Rural in 1991 |
-0.20 (-0.39, -0.01) |
0.2 (-0.02, 0.43) |
-0.24 (-0.48, 0) |
-0.26 (-0.49, -0.03) |
-0.15 (-0.4, 0.09) |
0.15 (-0.09, 0.4) |
| Rural in 1994 |
-0.19 (-0.38, 0) |
0.17 (-0.06, 0.4) |
0.24 (0.02, 0.46) |
0.08 (-0.15, 0.31) |
0.01 (-0.23, 0.24) |
|
| Rural in 1998 |
0.03 (-0.14, 0.2) |
0.01 (-0.18, 0.21) |
0.21 (0, 0.42) |
-0.1 (-0.32, 0.11) |
||
| Rural in 2002 |
-0.08 (-0.23, 0.08) |
0.23 (0.04, 0.42) |
0.05 (-0.15, 0.24) |
|||
| Attained schooling (y) |
0.02 (0.02, 0.03) |
0.02 (0.01, 0.03) |
0.02 (0.01, 0.03) |
|||
| Rural in 2005 |
-0.35 (-0.49, -0.21) |
0.14 (-0.02, 0.29) |
||||
| Rural in 2009 |
-0.20 (-0.31, -0.10) |
|||||
| Formal employment in 2009 |
0.05 (0.01, 0.10) |
Values are displayed estimate and 95% confidence interval from multivariable linear regressions with varying precision reported (all independent variables were entered into the regression in their original units)