Table 3.
Predictor: Frequency of Close Friends useb | Model 1 | Model 2c | ||||||||||||||||
|
Estimate | SE | P value | Crude odds ratio (95% CI) | Estimate | SE | P value | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | ||||||||||
Outcome 1: Willingness of online help seeking d | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Frequency: often | 0.62 | 0.25 | .02 | 1.85 (1.13-3.04) | 0.57 | 0.26 | .03 | 1.76 (1.06-2.93) | |||||||||
|
Frequency: sometimes | 0.23 | 0.24 | .33 | 1.26 (0.79-1.99) | 0.19 | 0.24 | .44 | 1.20 (0.75-1.92) | |||||||||
|
Frequency: seldom | 0.37 | 0.24 | .13 | 1.44 (0.90-2.31) | 0.35 | 0.24 | .16 | 1.41 (0.88-2.27) | |||||||||
Outcome 2: Willingness of seeking help from peers and friends e | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Frequency: often | 0.94 | 0.22 | <.001 | 2.57 (1.65-3.98) | 0.86 | 0.23 | <.001 | 2.36 (1.51-3.70) | |||||||||
|
Frequency: sometimes | 1.13 | 0.19 | <.001 | 3.10 (2.13-4.51) | 1.11 | 0.20 | <.001 | 3.02 (2.06-4.43) | |||||||||
|
Frequency: seldom | 0.58 | 0.18 | .002 | 1.78 (1.24-2.55) | 0.60 | 0.19 | .001 | 1.82 (1.27-2.63) |
aOrdinal logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the data.
bFor the predictor in both analyses, the frequency of using Close Friends has 4 outcome levels in ascending order: never, seldom, sometimes, and often. The response of “never” was chosen as the reference category.
cModel 2 adjusted for gender and school banding.
dFor outcome 1: willingness of online help seeking, the response of “no” was chosen as the reference category.
eFor outcome 2: willingness of seeking help from peers and friends, the response of “no” was chosen as the reference category.