Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 12;24(10):e37695. doi: 10.2196/37695

Table 3.

Summary of ordinal logistic regression analyses for the association of help-seeking willingness with the frequency of using Close Friends (n=1676).a

Predictor: Frequency of Close Friends useb Model 1 Model 2c

Estimate SE P value Crude odds ratio (95% CI) Estimate SE P value Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
Outcome 1: Willingness of online help seeking d

Frequency: often 0.62 0.25 .02 1.85 (1.13-3.04) 0.57 0.26 .03 1.76 (1.06-2.93)

Frequency: sometimes 0.23 0.24 .33 1.26 (0.79-1.99) 0.19 0.24 .44 1.20 (0.75-1.92)

Frequency: seldom 0.37 0.24 .13 1.44 (0.90-2.31) 0.35 0.24 .16 1.41 (0.88-2.27)
Outcome 2: Willingness of seeking help from peers and friends e

Frequency: often 0.94 0.22 <.001 2.57 (1.65-3.98) 0.86 0.23 <.001 2.36 (1.51-3.70)

Frequency: sometimes 1.13 0.19 <.001 3.10 (2.13-4.51) 1.11 0.20 <.001 3.02 (2.06-4.43)

Frequency: seldom 0.58 0.18 .002 1.78 (1.24-2.55) 0.60 0.19 .001 1.82 (1.27-2.63)

aOrdinal logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the data.

bFor the predictor in both analyses, the frequency of using Close Friends has 4 outcome levels in ascending order: never, seldom, sometimes, and often. The response of “never” was chosen as the reference category.

cModel 2 adjusted for gender and school banding.

dFor outcome 1: willingness of online help seeking, the response of “no” was chosen as the reference category.

eFor outcome 2: willingness of seeking help from peers and friends, the response of “no” was chosen as the reference category.