Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 12;24(10):e37695. doi: 10.2196/37695

Table 4.

Summary of ordinal logistic regression analyses for risk of suicidality (n=1676).a

Outcome: risk of suicidalityb Model 1 Model 2c

Estimate SE P value Crude odds ratio (95% CI) Estimate SE P value Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
Predictor 1: Frequency of Close Friends use (Reference: never)

Often 0.47 0.21 .03 1.60 (1.06-2.41) 0.40 0.22 .07 1.49 (0.98-2.28)

Sometimes 0.44 0.21 .03 1.56 (1.04-2.34) 0.42 0.21 .047 1.53 (1.01-2.31)

Seldom 0.19 0.19 .34 1.21 (0.82-1.76) 0.23 0.20 .25 1.26 (0.85-1.85)
Predictor 2: Online help-seeking willingness (Reference: no)

Yes 0.46 0.18 .01 1.59 (1.11-2.27) 0.40 0.19 .03 1.50 (1.04-2.15)
Predictor 3: Peer-oriented help-seeking willingness (Reference: no)

Yes –0.58 0.16 <.001 0.56 (0.41-0.77) –0.61 0.17 <.001 0.55 (0.39-0.75)

aOrdinal logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the data.

bRisk of suicidality had 3 outcome levels: “no ideation,” “having SI,” and “having attempted suicide.” The response of “no ideation” was chosen as the reference category.

cModel 2 adjusted for gender and school banding.