Table 4.
Outcome: risk of suicidalityb | Model 1 | Model 2c | ||||||||
|
Estimate | SE | P value | Crude odds ratio (95% CI) | Estimate | SE | P value | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | ||
Predictor 1: Frequency of Close Friends use (Reference: never) | ||||||||||
|
Often | 0.47 | 0.21 | .03 | 1.60 (1.06-2.41) | 0.40 | 0.22 | .07 | 1.49 (0.98-2.28) | |
|
Sometimes | 0.44 | 0.21 | .03 | 1.56 (1.04-2.34) | 0.42 | 0.21 | .047 | 1.53 (1.01-2.31) | |
|
Seldom | 0.19 | 0.19 | .34 | 1.21 (0.82-1.76) | 0.23 | 0.20 | .25 | 1.26 (0.85-1.85) | |
Predictor 2: Online help-seeking willingness (Reference: no) | ||||||||||
|
Yes | 0.46 | 0.18 | .01 | 1.59 (1.11-2.27) | 0.40 | 0.19 | .03 | 1.50 (1.04-2.15) | |
Predictor 3: Peer-oriented help-seeking willingness (Reference: no) | ||||||||||
|
Yes | –0.58 | 0.16 | <.001 | 0.56 (0.41-0.77) | –0.61 | 0.17 | <.001 | 0.55 (0.39-0.75) |
aOrdinal logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the data.
bRisk of suicidality had 3 outcome levels: “no ideation,” “having SI,” and “having attempted suicide.” The response of “no ideation” was chosen as the reference category.
cModel 2 adjusted for gender and school banding.