Table 4.
Study. (year). Ref | Source | Mechanism | Promising therapeutic target |
---|---|---|---|
Ligon et al.(2021) (94) | tissue from OS patients | Targeting MDSCs suppressing T-cell infiltration into the PM of OS to block OS metastasis | Gene regulation |
Deng et al.(2020) (95) | 80 OS patients from database and 27 OS patients | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduce the MDSCs number and convert OS into an immune “hot” tumor. | MDSCs’ reduction |
Jiang et al.(2019) (96) | K7M2 mouse OS model | OS-infiltrating MDSCs were CXCR4 positive and would migrate toward an SDF-1 gradient. The axis of CXCR4/SDF-1 could reduce the apoptosis of MDSCs. | MDSCs’ apoptosis induction |
Shi et al.(2019) (97) | K7M2 mouse OS model | Combining SNA with anti-PD1 regulated innate immune cells, slowed OS tumor growth and prolonged survival time of tumor-bearing mice via inhibiting the function of MDSCs with a selective PI3Kδ/γ inhibitor to enhance responses to immune checkpoint blockade. | Supplement classical immunotherapy |
Uehara et al.(2019) (98) | K7M2neo OS model | Met regulated the metabolism of MDSCs to decrease OXPHOS and enhance glycolysis to inhibit OS growth. | MDSCs’ metabolism |
Guan et al.(2017) (99) | Mouse tumor model | IL-18 inducing MDSC to infiltrate into the OS parenchyma | MDSCs’ migration |
Long et al.(2016) (100) | NSG mice | ATRA treatment enhances efficacy of GD2-CAR T cells against OS by eradicating monocytic MDSCs and diminishing the suppressive capacity of granulocytic MDSCs. | MDSCs’ reduction |