Table 6.
Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria | |
---|---|---|
Population | Individuals over 18 years with localized (early stage) prostate cancer | N/A |
Interventions | Any of the following interventions: surgery, high-intensity focused ultrasonography, radiation therapy, ablative therapy, hormonotherapy | Any non-approved or experimental treatment |
Comparator | No treatment, the same intervention with a minor difference (e.g., difference in dose or scheduling), watchful waiting, or active surveillance | Any other comparators |
Outcomesa |
Potential benefits 1. Reduced prostate cancer mortality 2. Reduced all-cause mortality 3. Decreased rate of metastasis development Potential harms 4. Incontinence (urinary or bowel) 5. Erectile dysfunction 6. Complications due to treatment (i.e., surgical AEs, radiotherapy toxicity, endocrinological effects) Either benefit or harm 7. Quality of life or functioning (overall and disease-specific) 8. Psychological effects |
N/A |
Timing of outcome assessment | Not specified | N/A |
Delivery setting | Any country | N/A |
Study design | RCTs (including cluster RCTs), observational studies with consecutively enrolled populations | Case reports, case series, systematic reviewsb, narrative reviews, editorials, commentaries, letters, conference proceedings, government reports. |
Language | English | N/A |
Dates of publication | Before 2019 (UK NSC) | Full-text studies published prior to 2018 or 2014 for the specific interventions were not included in the NICE systematic review. |
aThe UK NSC has indicated that the rate of disease recurrence after successful initial treatment is an outcome of interest; however, this outcome is not of interest to the CTFPHC
bThe reference list of relevant systematic reviews will be reviewed for relevant studies