Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 22;58(10):1332. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101332

Table 2.

Review Outcome Measures, Adverse Events, TENS Ratings, and TENS Recommendations.

Year Topic Author Pain Outcome
Measures
Movement Evoked Pain Adverse Event Reported Rating Positive (+)
Negative (−)
Equivalent (=)
Undecided (u)
TENS Recommendation Ref
2021 Acute Pain Davis Pain scores, not specified No Reported no adverse events (+) Promising results for patients with hip fractures in the prehospital setting and would benefit from further studies [80]
2019 Acute Pain Binny VAS, NRS No Limited data with 2 studies reporting no AE’s. (u) Recommended further studies [53]
2015 Acute Pain Johnson VAS, NRS < VRS, MPQ No Yes (+) While TENS use for acute pain in adults remains a matter of debate, it compares favorably with many alternatives because it is inexpensive, self-administered, safe, and readily available to patients [1]
2014 Acute Pain Simpson VAS N/A No safety risks identified (+) Emergency medical services should consider TENS when pharmacological pain management is unavailable or restricted. [81]
2020 Cancer, Neurological Moisset HA days per month No No (+) TENS may be effective for acute migraine HA; larger well-conducted studies are necessary to confirm efficacy [82]
2020 Cancer, Neurological Ogle VAS, NRS, SF-MPQ No No (+) TENS as a self-management strategy monitored by a clinician may be beneficial in reduction in peripheral neuropathy pain [83]
2018 Cancer, Neurological Tao HA days per month No Yes (+) TENS may be an effective alternative to reduce monthly HA days. Well-designed RCTs are necessary to confirm and update findings. [85]
2018 Cancer, Neurological Amatya VAS, BPI, NRS No No (u) Further studies with larger sample sizes [84]
2017 Cancer, Neurological Gibson VAS No Three studies reported AE. AEs included skin irritation (u) Improve the quality of design of TENS studies [54]
2015 Cancer, Neurological Johnson No Articles to review No Articles to review No Articles to review (u) No articles to review [63]
2014 Cancer, Neurological Bao VAS, NRS No No (+) TENS might have beneficial for pain reduction in bone cancer; small sample sizes [62]
2014 Cancer, Neurological Jawahar VAS, McGill Pain Questionnaire No No (+) TENS may be effective in reducing central neuropathic pain in MS. Recommendations were made for more rigorous design and reporting is needed to determine TENS effectiveness for individuals with MS. [86]
2021 Chronic Pain Paley VAS, Estimated Effect No Yes (+) Multiple reviews with multiple conditions. TENS has a tendency toward benefit in 16/169 reviews, no benefit in 13/169 reviews and inconclusive in 87/168 reviews. Inconsistency in data limiting recommendations. Recommendations made to improve data collection in future studies. [56]
2019 Chronic Pain Gibson VAS, NRS No Three studies reported AE. AEs for the studies reported were primarily skin irritation. (u) Recommendations for future studies focused on the comparison groups, timing of pain ratings, data for parameters for reproducibility with adequate intensity and larger sample sizes. [87]
2018 Chronic Pain Almeida VAS No No (+) TENS and IFC had positive effects on pain level and function [55]
2018 Fibromyalgia Honda VAS No No (+) Further studies needed
[88]
2017 Fibromyalgia Johnson VAS, NRS, Pain relief ≥ 30% Yes/No Withdrawal due to increased pain, no reasons given for some of the studies (u) Further high-quality studies are needed. [57]
2017 Fibromyalgia Salazar VAS No No (u) Biases noted with the studies and further research with high quality studies. [89]
2021 Knee Osteoarthritis Shi VAS No No (+) None [90]
2017 Knee Osteoarthritis Li VAS No No (+) Further high-quality studies are needed. [91]
2017 Knee Osteoarthritis Zhu VAS in 24 h post-surgery No No (+) Further studies needed for duration and intensity of TENS. [92]
2016 Knee Osteoarthritis Chen VAS No No (+) Further RCT with studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow up time frame. [93]
2016 Knee Osteoarthritis Cherian VAS No No (+) Further long-term studies are needed. [94]
2015 Knee Osteoarthritis Zeng VAS, WOMAC, Present Pain Intensity No Reported in 7 of 27 studies with no AEs related to TENS (−) None [95]
2022 Musculoskeletal Ferrillo VAS No No (+) TENS may decrease pain
after as single 50 min
session and over 25 weeks
for 10 weeks
[96]
2021 Musculoskeletal Koukoulithras VAS No No (+) May be helpful, further studies needed. [60]
2019 Musculoskeletal Martimbianco VAS No No (u) Further high-quality studies are needed. [59]
2018 Musculoskeletal Wu VAS, NRS, McGill Pain Questionnaire, Borg Verbal rating scale (BPS) No No (+), (=) TENS was found to improve function disability after within 6 weeks of the treatment. [97]
2016 Musculoskeletal Page VAS No No (u) Recommendations for TENS were uncertain if TENS is more or less effective than glucocorticoid injection with respect to pain, function, global treatment success and active range of motion because of the very low-quality evidence from a single trial. [98]
2014 Musculoskeletal Page VAS, Pain relief > 30% No No (u) Further studies needed. [99]
2022 Pelvic Health Arik VAS, NRS No AE reporting in 3 of 4 studies; No AE reported in these 3 studies (+) TENS is safe and well-tolerated and has shown evidence of pain reduction in primary dysmenorrhea [100]
2020 Pelvic Health Zimpel VAS No No (+), (u) TENS plus analgesia may be of benefit in the first 24 h. [61]
2016 Pelvic Health Igwea VAS, NRS, McGill Pain Questionnaire No No (+) Additional rigorous high-quality trials are still needed to make conclusive recommendations. [101]