Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 24;11(10):1090. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11101090

Table 3.

Morphological and molecular identifications of ticks, frequency of infestation, and natural infection by molecular detection of ticks.

Site of Sampling Sampled Animals 1/Sampling of Immature Stages 2 Immature Stages Obtained 3
N = 95 n (%)
Sampled Animals N = 138 n/N (%) Infested Animals N = 16
n (%)
Tick Identification 4 Detected Microorganisms
R. sanguineus s.l.
N = 173 n (%)
R. microplus
N = 18 n (%)
Ehrlichia
n (%)
Anaplasma
n (%)
Coxiella
n (%)
10015 CFFW/Not 0 (0.0) 47 (34.1) Canines 2 (12.5) 23 (13.3) 0 (0.0) 9 (39.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
10027 CFFW/Not 0 (0.0) 5 (3.6) Canines 2 (12.5) 41 (23.7) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.4) 0 (0.0) 5 (12.2)
10027 5 C/Yes 0 (0.0) 2 (1.4) Canines 1 (6.3) 1 (0.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
10020 CF/Not 0 (0.0) 8 (5.8) Canines 3 (18.6) 52 (30.1) 0 (0.0) 15 (28.9) 1 (1.9) 9 (17.3)
10001 CBEFFW/Yes 95 (100) 10 (7.2) Canines 1 (6.3) 26 (15.0) 0 (0.0) 4 (15.4) 1 (3.8) 3 (11.5)
10083 C/Not 0 (0.0) 2 (1.4) Canines 1 (6.3) 4 (2.3) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
10198 CEFFW/Not 0 (0.0) 10 (7.2) Canines 2 (12.5) 8 (4.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (25.0)
10227 CBFW/Yes 0 (0.0) 18 (13) Canines 2 (12.5) 18 (10.4) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (5.6)
0 (0.0) Bovines 2 (12.5) 0 (0.0) 18 (100) 7 (38.9) 6 (33.3) 0 (0.0)
10094 /Not 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
10082 C/Not 0 (0.0) 2 (1.4) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
10131 C/Not 0 (0.0) 1 (0.8) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
10163 /Not 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
10205 FW/Not 0 (0.0) 16 (11.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
10242 CF/Not 0 (0.0) 3 (2.2) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
10243 CFW/Not 0 (0.0) 12 (8.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
10263 CF/Not 0 (0.0) 2 (1.4) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)

1 Sampled animals: C: canines, B: bovines, E: equines, F: felines, FW: fowls. 2 Sampling at immature stages using the dragging technique. 3 Only larvae were obtained using the dragging technique. 4 Morphological identifications verified with the COI molecular marker. 5 Workplace.