Table 3.
Characteristics of lesions that were inaccurately identified by the computer-assisted diagnosis system
|
Characteristics
|
Accurate identification (n = 186)
|
Inaccurate identification (n = 23)
|
P
value
|
| Lesion location, n (%) | 1.000 | ||
| Ce | 2 (1.1) | 0 (0) | |
| Ut | 13 (7.0) | 2 (8.7) | |
| Mt | 152 (81.7) | 20 (87.0) | |
| Lt | 19 (10.2) | 1 (4.3) | |
| Lesion size (cm), median (Q1, Q3) | 2.0 (1.1-4.0) | 3 (1.5-3.0) | 0.476 |
| Paris classification, n (%) | 0.038 | ||
| Type 0-IIb | 95 (51.1) | 17 (73.9) | |
| Other non-flat types | 91 (48.9) | 6 (26.1) | |
| Circumference, n (%) | 0.591 | ||
| < 1/4 | 107 (57.4) | 10 (43.5) | |
| 1/4-1/2 | 54 (29.0) | 9 (39.1) | |
| 1/2-3/4 | 16 (8.6) | 2 (8.7) | |
| > 3/4 | 9 (4.8) | 2 (8.7) | |
| Depth of invasion, n (%) | 0.123 | ||
| EP-LPM | 144 (77.4) | 21 (91.3) | |
| MM and deeper | 42 (22.6) | 2 (8.7) |
Ce: Cervical esophagus; Ut: Upper thoracic esophagus; Mt: Middle thoracic esophagus; Lt: Lower thoracic esophagus; Q1: Lower quantile; Q3: Upper quantile; EP-LPM: Epithelium or lamina propria; MM: Muscularis mucosa.