Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 27.
Published in final edited form as: JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec 14;13(23):2745–2752. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.059

TABLE 3.

Multivariate Cox Regression for the Primary and Secondary Endpoints Between PFO Closure and Medical Therapy in the 134 Patients With Thrombophilia

Outcomes PFO Closure (n = 89) Medical Therapy (n = 45) Model 1*
Model 2
Model 3
HR (95% CI) p Value HR (95% CI) p Value HR (95% CI) p Value
Recurrent stroke or TIA 6 (6.7) 15 (33.3) 0.21 (0.08–0.57) 0.002 0.21 (0.08–0.57) 0.002 0.25 (0.08–0.74) 0.012

Recurrent stroke 1 (1.1) 6 (13.3) 0.09 (0.01–0.83) 0.033 0.08 (0.01–0.75) 0.027 0.06 (0.01–0.62) 0.019

Recurrent TIA 5 (5.6) 9 (20.0) 0.29 (0.09–0.92) 0.036 0.30 (0.09–0.97) 0.043 0.48 (0.13–1.74) 0.262
*

Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, and therapy options.

Model 2 adjusted for age, sex, therapy options and traditional risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking history).

Model 3 adjusted for age, sex, therapy options, traditional risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking history) and PFO characteristics (large shunt and atrial septal aneurysm).

CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; PFO = patent foramen ovale; TIA = transient ischemic attack.