TABLE 2.
Magnetic mismatch negativity response (MMNm).
| Complex musical multi-feature paradigm | Simple control paradigm | |||
|
|
|
|||
| Musicians | Non-musicians | Musicians | Non-musicians | |
| Frequency (F) | 0.0002*** | 0.0002*** | 0.0003*** | 0.0014** |
| Intensity (I) | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** |
| Location (L) | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** |
| FI | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** | 0.0003*** |
| IL | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** |
| LF | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** |
| FIL | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** | < 0.0001*** |
Monte Carlo p-values from non-parametric, cluster-based permutation tests of deviant > standard. **p < 0.0050; ***p < 0.0005 (uncorrected alpha). Analysis was conducted on the 100–300 ms post-stimulus time window on nine supra-temporal combined gradiometer sensors in each hemisphere using the maxsum test statistic over 10,000 random permutations.