Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 24;36(11):2558–2566. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01701-2

Table 1.

a Summary of key evidence for ruxolitinib in treatment of steroid-refractory GvHD. b. Summary of key evidence for ECP in treatment of steroid-refractory GvHD.

Study Trial design Treatment ORR %/CR% Other results
a
Acute GvHD
 Jagasia et al. [21] (n = 71) Open-label, single-arm, multicentre phase II Ruxolitinib + CS 55/27 ORR in skin, liver, and gut 61%, 27%, and 46%; median DOR at 6 mo was 345 days; 6-mo and 12-mo OS 51% and 43%; 6-mo and 12-mo NRM 44% and 53%
 Zeiser et al. [15] (n = 309; 154 vs155) Open-label, randomized, multicentre phase III Ruxolitinib + CS vs best available therapy 62 vs 39 (p < 0.001)/ 34 vs 19 ns ORR (Day 56): 40% vs 22% (p < 0.001); median FFS 5 mo vs 1 mo: median OS 11 mo vs 6.5 mo; 6-mo NRM 36% vs 43%; 12-mo NRM 43% vs 45%; CMV infection 26% vs 21%.
 Moiseev et al. [22] (n = 32, children and adults) Prospective Ruxolitinib + CS± other IS 75/63 Reduced ORR in grade III-IV aGvHD, liver GvHD severity, grade IV GI GvHD; OS 59%; CMV infection 59%
 Liu et al. [23] (n = 40, haplo) Prospective Ruxolitinib + CS 85/62.5 Worse ORR and OS in liver involvement; ORR in skin, liver, and gut 83%, 48%, and 82%; 6-mo OS and TRM 57% and 33%; GvHD recurrence 26.5%
 Zeiser et al. [24] (n = 54) Retrospective Ruxolitinib + CS + IS 81.5/46 Median time to response 1.5 weeks; 6-mo OS 79%, aGvHD recurrence in 7%; CMV infection in 33%
 Leung et al. [25] (n = 26) Retrospective Ruxolitinib + CS 86/36 CR at 3 mo 68%; 1-yr and 2-yr OS 58% and 37%
Wei et al. [26] (n = 23) Retrospective Ruxolitinib + CS ±  IS 86.9/56.5 ORR in skin, liver and gut 88%, 67% and 92%; 1-yr and 2-yr OS 83% and 75%; CMV reactivation in 52%
 Gomez et al. [27] (n = 23) Retrospective Ruxolitinib + CS 69.5/21.7 ORR in skin, liver, and gut 69%, 69%, and 67%; CR in skin, liver, and gut 19%, 23%, and 19%; 6-mo OS 47%
Chronic GvHD
 Zeiser et al. [19] (n = 329;165 vs 164) Open-label, randomized, multicentre phase III Ruxolitinib + CS vs best available therapy + CS 50/7 vs 26/3 ORR in skin 41%, mouth 50%, upper GI 50%, lower GI 53%, joints 38%; median FFS at week 24 > 18.6 mo vs 5.7 mo (p < 0.001); 6-mo FFS 75% vs 44.5%; symptom release at week 24 24% vs 11% (p = 0.0001); 1-yr OS 81% vs 84%
 Moiseev et al. [22] (n = 43, adults and children) Prospective Ruxolitinib + CS ± other IS 81/21 No changes in eye, lung, joint, and genitalia severity; OS 85%; NRM 7%
 Wang et al. [28] (n = 70) Retrospective Ruxolitinib + CS ± other IS 74/49 Lower ORR in severe cGvHD; best ORR in mouth with 83%; lowest ORR in liver with 64%; 1-yr OS 66%; 1-yr NRM 20%
 Gomez et al. [27] (n = 56) Retrospective multicentre Ruxolitinib + CS 57/3.5 ORR in skin sclerosis 56%, in lung 61.5% and gut 56%; 1-yr OS 81%; CMV infection in 20%
 Yang et al. [29] (n = 53 children) Retrospective Ruxolitinib + CS 81/28 GvHD recurrence in 31%; 6-mo OS and EFS 100% and 97%
 Redondo et al. [30] (n = 48) Retrospective Ruxolitinib + CS 77/15 ORR of 77% in sclerotic skin, 45% in gut, and 33% in lung disease; similar ORR in moderate and severe cGvHD of 74% and 77%; 2-yr NRM 15%; 2-yr OS 83%
 Modi et al. [31] (n = 46) Retrospective Ruxolitinib + CS ± other IS 48/10 12-mo ORR of skin 25%, 60% mouth, 26% eye, 10% lung and 41% joints; 1-yr FFS 54%
 Zeiser et al. [24] (n = 41) Retrospective, multicentre Ruxolitinib + CS ± other IS 85/7 6-mo OS 97%; CMV infection in 15%
 Xue et al. [32] (n = 36) Retrospective Ruxolitinib + CS 62/na Significant improvement in skin, genital and oral GvHD at 3 mo, ocular GvHD at 6 mo; 1-and 2-yr OS 81% and 74%; 1-and 2-yr TRM 19% and 19%
 Wei et al. [26] (n = 32) Retrospective Ruxolitinib + CS ± other IS 78/25 ORR for mouth 91%, eye 80%, liver 80%, lung 44%: lower ORR in severe cGvHD of 65%; 1-and 2-yr OS 81% and 73%
 Leung et al. [25] (n = 31) Retrospective Ruxolitinib + CS 86/17 6-mo ORR and CR 83% and 52%; 1-and 2-yr OS 94% and 81%
b
Acute GvHD
 Greinix et al . [34] (n = 59) Prospective, single-arm, phase II ECP + CS in second-line 70/60 CR in skin 82%, liver 61% and gut 61%; 4-yr OS 47% (59% and 11% in ECP responders and non-responders); 4-yr TRM 36% (14% and 73% in ECP responders and non-responders)
 Amat et al. [35] (n = 37) Prospective, multicenter ECP + CS in second-line 73/40.5 ORR in skin 71%, liver 54.5% and gut 67%; significant longer OS in CR pts (median > 47 mo vs 12 mo)
 Jagasia et al. [36] (n = 108) Retrospective, multicentre ECP + CS vs Inolimomab/Etanercept + CS in second-line 66/54 vs 32/20 (p = 0.001) ECP as independent predictor of ORR (HR, 3.42, p = 0.007), OS (HR, 2.12, p = 0.018); ECP associated with superior OS (HR, 4.6, p = 0.016) in SR aGvHD grade II and lower NRM (HR, 0.45, p = 0.018)
 DasGupta et al. [37] (n = 128) Retrospective, multicentre ECP + CS in second-line 77/67 6-mo-FFTF 77%; 2-yr OS 56%; 2-yr TRM 34%
 Worel et al. [38] (n = 99) Retrospective, single center ECP + CS in second-line 75/53 ORR in skin 80%, liver 61% and GI 75%; 1-yr and 5-yr TRM 22% and 31%; 1-yr and 5-yr OS 69% and 50%
 Calore et al. [39] (n = 72, children) Retrospective ECP + CS ± other IS 83/64 CR in skin in 70%, liver in 84%, and gut in 71%; 5-yr OS 71%
 Niittyvuopio et al. [40] (n = 52) Retrospective, single center ECP + CS in second-and third line 62/48 CR in skin 77%, liver 33%, and gut 34%; 1-yr OS 51%
 Perotti et al. [41] (n = 50, children) Retrospective, single center ECP + CS 68/32 ORR in skin 83%, liver 67%, and gut 73%; 1-yr OS 64%
 Malagola et al. [42] (n = 45) Retrospective, multicentre ECP + CS in second-line Na/91 CR in grade II 97% and grades III/IV 67%
 Messina et al. [43] (n = 33, children) Retrospective, single center ECP + CS ±  other IS 75/54 CR in skin 76%, liver 60% and gut 75%; 5-yr OS 69%
Chronic GvHD
 Flowers et al. [44] (n = 95; 48 vs 47) Prospective, randomized, multicenter ECP + CS ± other IS vs CS ± other IS 40 vs 10 at w12 in skin (p = 0.002) ORR in eye 30% vs 7% (p = 0.04) and mouth 53% vs 27% (p = 0.06); median % improvement of TSS at week 12 14.5% vs 8.5%, at week 24 31.4% in the ECP arm.
 Greinix et al. [45] (n = 29) Prospective, crossover, multicentre ECP + CS ± other IS 31% at w24 in skin ORR in liver 50%, mouth 70%, and joints 36%; median % improvement of TSS at week 24 25.8%
 Sakellari et al. [46] (n = 88) Prospective, single center ECP + CS 73/40 ORR in skin sclerosis 83%, visceral involvement 53% and lung 27%; 5-yr TRM 24%; 5-yr OS 64.5%
 Gandelman et al. [47] (n = 77) Prospective, multicentre ECP + CS ± other IS 62/14 ORR in skin 55%; ECP responses independent of risk factors of poor outcome
 Dignan et al. [48] (n = 82) Retrospective, single center ECP + CS ± other IS 79/na ORR in skin 92% and mouth 91% at 6 mo; 3-yr OS 69%
 Couriel et al. [49] (n = 71) Retrospective, single center ECP + CS ± other IS 61/20 ORR in skin 57%, liver 71% and mouth 78%; 1-yr OS 53%; response to ECP and platelet count at ECP start significantly predict NRM
 Greinix et al. [50] (n = 47) Retrospective, single center ECP + CS ± other IS 83/na CR in skin 68%, mouth 81%, and liver 68%

ORR overall response rate, CR complete response rate, CS corticosteroids, DOR duration of response, Mo months, OS overall survival, NRM nonrelapse mortality, Ns not significant, FFS failure-free survival, CMV cytomegalovirus, IS immunosuppressants, aGvHD acute graft-versus-host disease, GI gastrointestinal, Yr year cGvHD chronic graft-versus-host disease EFS event-free survival, TRM transplant-related mortality, Na not applicable, ECP extracorporeal photopheresis, ORR overall response rate, Pts patients, HR hazard ratio, SR steroid-refractor, FFTF freedom from treatment failure, TSS total skin score.