Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 23;122(12):2493–2514. doi: 10.1007/s00421-022-05041-y

Table 1.

Comparison of in vitro endothelial cell and in vivo vascular adaptive responses to common stimuli found during non-pharmacological interventions

Stimulus Interventions In vitro In vivo
Continuous elevation in flow

Exercise

Water immersion

Heat therapy

↑ eNOS

↓ Inflammatory cytokines

↑ Antioxidants

↑ Anti-inflammatory molecules

↑ Basal blood flow

↑ Maximal flow-mediated dilation

↑ Cerebrovascular responsiveness

Intermittent elevation in flow

Exercise

Heat therapy

??? ???
Oscillatory flow Pneumatic compression

Prolonged exposure:

↑ Inflammatory cytokines

↑ Adhesion molecules

↑ Vasoconstriction factors

↑ Basal blood flow

Improved functional outcomes

Loss of flow Ischemic preconditioning

Prolonged exposure:

↑ Inflammatory cytokines

↑ Cellular dysfunction

↑ Cell death

↑ Endothelium-dependent blood flow

↑ Maximal flow-mediated dilation

Hypoxia

Ischemic preconditioning

Hypoxia

↑ Inflammatory cytokines

↑ Oxidative stress

↑ Angiogenic factors

↑ eNOS

???
Increased temperature (Febrile/ ~ 39 °C) Heat therapy

↓ IL-6 response to TNFa

↓ Future hyperthermic damage

HSP protection against inflammation

↑ Basal blood flow

↑ Maximal flow-mediated dilation

↑ Cerebrovascular conductance

References for the stated responses can be found in Sects. “Ischemic preconditioning”, “Flow-independent adaptation in vivo” and 3.3

eNOS endothelial nitric oxide synthase, IL interleukin, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor, heat shock protein 72 HSP72, tumor necrosis factor alpha TNFα, ↑ increase, ↓ decrease,??? response currently unknown