Table 4.
Exploratory model assessing the effects of behavioral inhibition and lagged and leading self-expressed and peer-expressed affect on likelihood of dwelling to the peer
| Estimate | SE | z-value | CI lower | CI upper | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Fixed Effects | |||||
|
| |||||
| Intercept | −1.67*** | 0.32 | −5.18 | −2.30 | −1.04 |
| Percent Tracked Seconds | −0.65* | 0.30 | −2.16 | −1.24 | −0.06 |
| Age | −0.31 | 0.23 | −1.35 | −0.76 | 0.14 |
| Behavioral Inhibition | −0.04 | 0.23 | −0.19 | −0.50 | 0.41 |
| Lagged Self-Expressed Positive Affect | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.85 | −0.23 | 0.58 |
| Lagged Peer-Expressed Positive Affect | −0.15 | 0.20 | −0.75 | −0.53 | 0.26 |
| Leading Self-Expressed Positive Affect | 0.60** | 0.20 | 2.99 | 0.21 | 1.00 |
| Leading Peer-Expressed Positive Affect | 0.03 | 0.20 | 0.16 | −0.35 | 0.41 |
|
| |||||
| Random Effects | |||||
|
| |||||
| Individual:Dyad – Intercept | 1.08 (1.04) | ||||
| Dyad – Intercept | 0.23 (0.48) | ||||
Note: SE = Standard Error, CI = Confidence Interval.
*
p < .05
**
p < .01
***
p < .001.
Lags and leads are by 1 second.