TABLE 5.
Reduction quality difference and functional score difference reported in included studies. -: Not reported. N.S: not statistically significant. S.D*/*: statistically significant difference.
| Authors | Reduction score (scoring system) | Functional score (scoring system) |
|---|---|---|
| He et al., 2022 | — | N.S. (VAS score, Knee society score, ROM) |
| Zheng et al., 2022 | N.S. (Matta) | N.S. (Merle d'Aubigne score) |
| Long et al., 2021 | N.S. (Not specified) | N.S. (Harris score) |
| Boudissa et al., 2021b | N.S. (Matta) | — |
| Boudissa et al., 2021a | N.S. (Matta) | — |
| Wang et al., 2020c | — | N.S. (Harris score) |
| Wang et al., 2020a | N.S. (Matta + residual displacement) | — |
| Jia et al., 2020 | — | N.S. (Harris score, SF-36, PCS score, VAS score) |
| Huang et al., 2020 | 80% (VSP) vs 30% (control)* (good reduction rate = displacement <2 mm) | 75% (VSP) vs. 30% (control)* (excellent/good rate Harris) |
| Ramanathan et al., 2020 | 0 mm (VSP) vs 0.47 mm (control)* (interfragmentary separation) | 0.02 (VSP) vs 8.2 (control)* (VAS score) |
| Chen et al., 2020 | — | N.S. (KSS, SF-36, VAS-score, ROM) |
| Yoshii et al., 2019b | S.D.* (difference between operated and healthy side) | — |
| Li et al., 2019 | N.S. (displacement articular surface) | — |
| Hung et al., 2019 | N.S. (residual displacement) | — |
| Chen et al., 2019 | N.S. (Matta) | N.S. (Merle d’Aubigne score) |
| Totoki et al., 2018 | 86.1% (VSP) vs 74.8% (control)* (appropriate screw choices) | — |
| Maini et al., 2018 | 3.76 vs 4.09 (Matta, mean residual displacement: mm, no p-value) | — |
| Chen et al., 2018 | — | ASES scoring*, Constant-Murley score*, SF-36*, ROM* |
| Liu et al., 2017 | N.S. (lower limb alignment) | N.S. (Johner-Wruhs score) |
| Zhang et al., 2015 | — | — |
| Li et al., 2015 | 92% ± 4.2 (VSP) vs 83 % ± 5 (control)* (level of mandibular symmetry) | N.S. (patient satisfaction, interincisal opening) |