Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 14;9:1019344. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1019344

TABLE 1.

Comparative analysis of the gut microbiota between the groups at the genus level.

ND HFD HFD-MP
Lactobacillus 3.94 ± 1.30a 19.99 ± 3.94b 2.68 ± 0.77a
Barnesiella 12.65 ± 1.37b 0.00 ± 0.00a 0.00 ± 0.00a
Desulfovibrio 0.99 ± 0.22a 5.51 ± 0.72b 5.21 ± 1.51b
Alistipes 0.89 ± 0.13a 2.62 ± 0.52b 4.59 ± 0.43c
Turicibacter 7.72 ± 1.12b 0.00 ± 0.00a 0.00 ± 0.00a
Clostridium_XlVa 2.97 ± 0.79a 1.85 ± 0.43a 2.57 ± 0.24a
Lactococcus 0.00 ± 0.00a 4.09 ± 1.55b 1.22 ± 0.22ab
Bacteroides 0.42 ± 0.10a 0.52 ± 0.11a 4.07 ± 1.21b
Parabacteroides 2.28 ± 0.43b 0.39 ± 0.12a 2.10 ± 0.20b
Helicobacter 0.66 ± 0.28a 0.62 ± 0.19a 2.25 ± 0.75a
Mucispirillum 0.40 ± 0.15a 0.82 ± 0.37ab 2.14 ± 0.64b
Oscillibacter 0.80 ± 0.23a 0.94 ± 0.21ab 1.56 ± 0.13b
Roseburia 0.00 ± 0.00a 1.49 ± 0.51b 1.07 ± 0.39ab
Romboutsia 0.02 ± 0.01a 1.29 ± 0.3b 0.38 ± 0.21a
Clostridium_XlVb 0.25 ± 0.05a 0.57 ± 0.09ab 0.81 ± 0.13b
Enterorhabdus 0.78 ± 0.36a 0.19 ± 0.06a 0.16 ± 0.04a
Bifidobacterium 0.87 ± 0.22b 0.25 ± 0.07a 0.00 ± 0.00a
Prevotella 1.10 ± 0.26b 0.00 ± 0.00a 0.00 ± 0.00a
Acetatifactor 0.07 ± 0.03a 0.29 ± 0.11ab 0.35 ± 0.06b
Clostridium_sensu_stricto 0.60 ± 0.15b 0.00 ± 0.00a 0.06 ± 0.02a
Clostridium_IV 0.32 ± 0.05b 0.16 ± 0.05a 0.14 ± 0.03a
Clostridium_XVIII 0.03 ± 0.01a 0.2 ± 0.06ab 0.34 ± 0.09b
Odoribacter 0.10 ± 0.05a 0.38 ± 0.19a 0.07 ± 0.05a
Olsenella 0.17 ± 0.09ab 0.03 ± 0.01a 0.27 ± 0.07b
Akkermansia 0.40 ± 0.24a 0.00 ± 0.00a 0.00 ± 0.00a
Ruminococcus 0.37 ± 0.08b 0.00 ± 0.00a 0.00 ± 0.00a
Streptococcus 0.01 ± 0.00a 0.29 ± 0.10b 0.07 ± 0.02a
Parasutterella 0.27 ± 0.06b 0.00 ± 0.00a 0.00 ± 0.00a
Anaerotruncus 0.01 ± 0.00a 0.13 ± 0.06a 0.12 ± 0.04a
Others 60.91 ± 1.74 57.41 ± 3.27 67.75 ± 2.29

The data are represented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical differences were carried out by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test, p < 0.05 indicates significant differences.

The different letters indicate significant differences between the groups (p < 0.05).