Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 27;140(12):1181–1192. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.4394

Table 2. Prevalence of Dry Eye and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Results.

Source Etiology (DED and/or MGD) Measurement method: components contributing to diagnostic standards Diagnostic standards Prevalence denominator, No. Prevalence numerator, No. Prevalence, % (95% CI) Point or period of data collection Characteristics used to stratify prevalence or report an association Overall risk of bias
Dana et al,32 2019 DED Relevant ICD codesa; CPT codes for procedures and prescriptionsb; prescription fillsc (1) Overall DED (1) 9 732 272 (1) 513 988 (1) 5.3 (5.3-5.3)g Period: 2003-2015 (8 y) Age, sex, year of prevalence estimate (annual prevalence)h; NRi; NRj M
(2) Unspecified DEDd (2) 9 732 272 (2) 207 727 (2) 2.1 (2.1-2.1)g
(3) Specified DEDe (3) 9 732 272 (3) 24 809 (3) 0.3 (0.3-0.3)g
(4) Sjögren-type DEDf (4) 9 732 272 (4) 17 403 (4) 0.2 (0.2-0.2)g
Paulsen et al,33 2014 DED Symptomsk Symptoms (questionnaire)k 3275 475 14.5 (13.3-15.8)g Period: 2005-2008 (3 y) NRh; NRi; age, sex, medical comorbiditiesl, medication usej,m L
Davis et al,38 2015 DED Relevant ICD codes ICD-9 coden 460 611 7207 1.6 (1.5-1.6)g Period: 2008-2013 (5 y) NRh; medical comorbiditiesi,o; NRj H
Lee et al, 201839 and 201740 DED Relevant ICD codes (1) ICD-9 codep (1) 3 265 894 (1) 854 480 (1) 26.2 (26.1-26.2)g Period: 2010-2014 (4 y) NRh; age, sex, race and ethnicity, medical comorbidities, medication usei; NRj M
(2) ICD-9 codeq (2) 3 265 894 (2) 843 194 (2) 25.8 (25.8-25.9)g
(3) ICD-9 codesr (3) 3 265 894 (3) 9315 (3) 0.3 (0.3-0.3)g
(4) ICD-9 codess (4) 3 265 894 (4) 28 407 (4) 0.9 (0.9-0.9)g
(5) ICD-9 codest (5) 3 265 894 (5) 959 881 (5) 29.4 (29.3-29.4)
(6) ICD-9 codesu (6) 3 265 894 (6) 186 299 (6) 5.7 (5.7-5.7)g
Russo and Bass,41 2021 DED Relevant ICD codes; other ICD-10 codes and other (diagnoses contained in the attending optometrist’s assessment and plan) 424 121 28.5 (24.3-33.1)g Period: 2016-2017 (1-2 y) NRh; NRi; NRj H
Farrand et al,42 2017 DED Self-reported diagnosisv; symptomsv (1) Self-reported diagnosis with symptoms (1) 73 211 (1) 5051 (1) 6.9 (6.7-7.1)g Point: 2013 Age, sex, race and ethnicity, US region, dry eye disease severityh; NRi; age, sex, race/ethnicity, US regionj M
(2) Self-reported diagnosis with symptomsw (2) 73 211 (2) NR (2) 6.8 (6.6-7.0)
(3) Symptoms without self-reported diagnosis (3) 75 000 (3) 1789 (3) 2.4 (2.3-2.5)g
(4) Symptoms without self-reported diagnosisw (4) 75 000 (4) NR (4) 2.5 (2.3-2.6)
Stull et al,43 2017 DED Other Other (extracted from patient medical records) 400 187 46.8 (41.8-51.8)g Point: 2014/2015 NRh; NRi; NRj H
Chang et al,44 2018 DED Symptomsx (1) DEQ-5 ≥6 (1) 233 (1) 94 (1) 40.3 (34.0-47.0)g Point: 2016 Dry eye disease severityh; age, sex, race and ethnicity, medical comorbidities, medication usei; NRj M
(2) DEQ-5 ≥12 (2) 233 (2) 24 (2) 10.3 (6.7-14.9)g
(3) Chief concern dry eye symptoms (3) 233 (3) 60 (3) 25.8 (20.3-31.9)g
Manoj,45 2016 DED Signs (1) Tear hyperosmolarity (1) 9947 (1) 4605g (1) 46.3 (45.3-47.3)g NR Sex, dry eye disease severityh; medical comorbiditiesi; NRj H
(2) Tear osmolarity ≥316 mOsm/L (2) 9947 (2) 2885g (2) 29.0 (28.1-29.9)g
Yeh and Lin,35 2017y DED; MGD Symptomsz; signsaa (1) SPEED ≥9 (1) 101 (1) 19 (1) 18.8 (11.7-27.8)g Point: NR Dry eye disease severityh; age, sex, race and ethnicity, medication usei; NRj H
(2) SPEED ≥6 (2) 101 (2) 43 (2) 42.6 (32.8-52.8)g
(3) Meiboscore = 3 (3) 101 (3) 12 (3) 11.9 (6.2-19.8)g
Alghamdi et al,36 2016 MGD Signsbb,cc (1) Eyelid vascularity score ≥2 (1) 233 (1) 39 (1) 16.7 (12.2-22.2)g Point: NR Age, sex, race and ethnicity, medical comorbidities, medication useh; NRi; NRj H
(2) Meibum quality score ≥2 (2) 233 (2) 129 (2) 55.4 (48.7-61.9)g
Yalamanchili et al,34 2018 MGD Relevant ICD codes (1) ICD and EMR codes for MGD and MGD spectrum disorders (1) 19 314 (1) 2002 (1) 10.4 (9.9-10.8)g Period: 2014-2017 (3 y) Age, race and ethnicityh; NRi; NRj H

Abbreviations: CPT, Current Procedural Terminology; DED, dry eye disease; DEQ-5, 5-item dry eye questionnaire; EMR, electronic medical record; H, high; ICD-9, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; ICD-10, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision; L, low; M, moderate; MGD, meibomian gland dysfunction; NR, not reported; SPEED, Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness.

a

Driving indicators: 370.33, keratoconjunctivitis sicca; 370.34, exposure keratoconjunctivitis; 372.53, conjunctival xerosis; 375.15, tear film insufficiency, unspecified; 710.20, sicca syndrome, Sjögren; nondriving indicators: 370.20, superficial keratoconjunctivitis; 370.21, punctate keratitis; 714.0, rheumatoid arthritis; 695.4, discoid lupus erythematosus; 710.0, systemic lupus erythematosus; 373.34, discoid lupus erythematosus of eyelid.

b

Driving indicators: 68 760, closure of the lacrimal punctum (by thermocauterization, ligation, or laser surgery); 68 761, punctal plugs; 09.91, obliteration of lacrimal punctum.

c

Driving indicator: restasis prescription fill for cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion.

d

Using ICD-9 codes 375.15 and 370.33, at least 1 of each or 2 of the same.

e

Using ICD-9 codes nondriving indicators 370.21 and 370.20, at least 1 of 370.21 or 370.20 and 1 driving indicator (375.15 or 370.33).

f

Using ICD-9 code driving indicator 710.2, at least 2 of 710.2 OR 1 of 710.2 and 1 driving indicator (375.15 or 370.33).

g

Derived by binomial “exact” calculation.

h

Stratified by characteristic.

i

Characteristic included in a univariate analysis.

j

Characteristic included in a multivariate analysis.

k

Participants were asked “How often do you have dry eyes, a dry, gritty, or burning feeling?”; “How much does the dryness in your eyes bother you?”; “Is there a season of the year when the dryness in your eyes is the worst?”; and “Are you currently using eye drops at least once a day for dry eyes?” Participants who reported that symptoms were present sometimes or more often and that they were moderately bothersome or greater, or those who reported currently using eye drops at least once a day for dry eyes, were considered to be cases.

l

Arthritis, osteoporosis, allergies, thyroid disease, migraine headache, history of head injury (no loss of consciousness, loss of consciousness <5 minutes, loss of consciousness ≥5 minutes).

m

Antihistamines, acetaminophen, benzodiazepine, antidepressants, steroids, multivitamin, hormones (women).

n

ICD-9 code 375.15.

o

Diabetes (ICD-9 codes 250.00-250.93).

p

ICD-9 code indicative of tear film dysfunction (sicca syndrome [710.2] or keratoconjunctivitis sicca [370.33] or tear film insufficiency [375.15]).

q

ICD-9 code 375.15.

r

ICD-9 code 710.2.

s

ICD-9 code 370.33.

t

“Any dry eye” (tear film insufficiency [375.15] or visual discomfort [368.13] or pain in or around eye [379.91] or sicca syndrome [710.2] or keratoconjunctivitis sicca [370.33]).

u

ICD-9 code indicative of ocular pain (visual discomfort [368.13] or pain in or around eye [379.91]).

v

Participants were asked whether they had ever experienced dry eye. Possible responses were yes or no. Those who answered no to ever experiencing dry eye were classified as non-DED and were not asked any other DED-related questions. All participants who said yes were asked a series of dry eye–related questions. The first was whether their dry eye had ever been diagnosed by a physician. Possible responses were yes or no. Those who answered yes to experiencing dry eye but no to being diagnosed by a physician were classified as symptomatic–undiagnosed. Those who confirmed both experiencing dry eye and physician diagnosis were classified as diagnosed-DED and were given a list of symptoms (pain, light sensitivity, gritty sensation, feeling of a foreign body or sand in the eye, itching, redness, and blurring of vision) and asked to select all that applied.

w

Adjusted using the Horvitz-Thompson estimator and inverse probability weighting.

x

Using the DEQ-5.

y

Individual patient data are available.

z

Using the SPEED.

aa

Using the Meiboscore.

bb

Using the eyelid vascularity score (0-3).

cc

Using the meibum quality score (0-4).