Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 16;88(6):907–916. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.12.017

Table 5.

Summary of GRADE results.

Outcomes Potential absolute effects * (95% CI)
Relative effect (95% CI) No. of participants (studies) Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) Comments
Risk with [comparison] Risk with [intervention]
Internasal distance Average internasal distance was 0 (zero) DM 1.78 higher (0.95 higher to 2.6 higher) 54 (2 observational studies) ⨁◯◯◯ Very lowa, b
Oropharyngeal volume Mean oropharyngeal volume was 0 (zero) DM 2.18 higher (0.98 higher to 3.38 higher) 48 (2 observational studies) ⨁◯◯◯ Very lowa, b
Interzygomatic distance Interzygomatic mean distance was 0 (zero) DM 2.75 lower (15.96 lower to 10.47 higher) 54 (2 observational studies) ⨁◯◯◯ Very lowa, b
Nasal volume Mean nasal volume was 0 (zero) DM 3 higher (0.25 lower to 6.25 higher) 48 (2 observational studies) ⨁◯◯◯ Very lowa, b
a

High risk of selection bias.

b

Small number of studies and patients.