Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2022 May 7;96:105662. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105662

Table 2.

Mean (standard deviation) of cross-correlation coefficient and joint excursion.

DM
PN
OC YC DMPN-OC OC-YC
Mean
differenc
e 95%
CIa
p-
valueb
Partial
eta
Squared
c
Mean
differenc
e 95%
CIa
p-
value
d
Cohen’
s de
Cross-correlation coefficient Midfoot sagittal&Ankle sagittal 0.31 (0.61) 0.65 (0.52) 0.90 (0.16) (−1.40, −0.30) 0.003* 0.10 (−1.02, 0.02) 0.059 0.59
Midfoot sagittal & Ankle frontal −0.24 (0.61) −0.58 (0.53) −0.80 (0.20) (0.21, 1.21) 0.006* 0.09 (−0.21, 0.70) 0.286 0.33
Ankle sagittal & Ankle frontal −0.85 (0.16) −0.93 (0.04) −0.91 (0.09) (0.10, 0.60) 0.007* 0.09 (−0.31, 0.13) 0.425 0.23
Joint excursion Midfoot sagittal 2.2 (5.8) 8.5 (8.6) 11.4 (5.4) (−9.9, −2.8) <0.001* 0.15 (−7.3, 1.5) 0.192 0.40
Ankle sagittal 12.5 (6.0) 21.3 (6.5) 23.2 (5.1) (−12.4, −5.9) <0.001* 0.29 (−5.5, 1.6) 0.275 0.33
Ankle frontal 8.8 (4.0) 10.1 (2.2) 10.3 (3.8) (−3.0, 0.85) 0.274 0.02 (−2.0, 1.6) 0.812 0.07
a:

Mean difference 95% confidence interval (CI) (lower bound, upper bound). The CI of the cross-correlation coefficient is based on the transformed Z-score.

b:

Analysis of covariance controlling for age. The p-value of the cross-correlation coefficient is based on the transformed Z-score.

c:

Partial eta squared is the effect size of DMPN-OC comparison. The effect size of the cross-correlation coefficient is calculated based on the Z-score.

d:

Two sample t-test. The p-value of the cross-correlation coefficient is based on the transformed Z-score.

e:

Cohen’s d is the effect size of OC-YC comparison. The effect size of the cross-correlation coefficient is calculated based on the Z-score.

*

Significant comparison (p<.05).

Abbreviation: DMPN, diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy; OC, older controls; YC, younger controls; CI, confidence interval.