Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 28;2(4):350–367. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.10.006

Table 1.

Studies Investigating fMRI Functional Connectivity Differences Between ADHD and Typical Development Grouped by Cognitive Domain

Study Analysis Method Task (Contrast) NADHD (% Male) AgeADHD, Years, Mean (SD) Medication History Medication Washout ADHD Comorbidities NControl (% Male) AgeControl, Years, Mean (SD) Control > ADHD ADHD > Control
Attention
Li et al., 2012 (39) SBC CPT (unspecified) 22 (55%) 11.6 (2.86) Current MPH use (41%); medication-free (59%) 48 hours None 22 (45%) 12.1 (2.23) L pulvinar nuclei ↔ R IFC, MFG; R pulvinar nuclei ↔ R PFC R pulvinar nuclei ↔ BIL occipital lobe
Luo et al., 2018 (40) GTTs Cued attention task (cues) 17 (77%) 24.69 (2.1) Current stimulant use (12%); past stimulant use (unspecified) 48 hours None 33 (85%) 24.27 (2.2) Acting network hubs in BIL IPL; L IPL ↔ L SFG; degree in R MFG; betweenness centrality in L SFG, MFG, precentral, R IFC Acting network hubs in L MFG and precentral
Rubia et al., 2009 (41) SBC CPT (targets > nontargets) 13 (100%) 12.5 (1.3) Medication-naïve (100%) ODD/CD (8%) 13 (100%) 13 (1.7) L IFC ↔ striatum, cerebellum; R IFC ↔ striatum, BIL cerebellum; BIL thalamus/striatum ↔ striatum, R cerebellum; L striatum ↔ BIL cerebellum, R striatum; ACC ↔ cerebellum, cerebellar vermis; R IPL ↔ cerebellum, L IPL; cerebellar vermis ↔ PCC; R cerebellum ↔ PCC, L IPL; L cerebellum ↔ L IPL None
Xia et al., 2014 (42)
GTTs
CPT (unspecified)
22 (55%)
11.6 (2.86)
Current MPH use (41%); medication-free (59%)
48 hours
None
22 (45%)
12.1 (2.23)
Nodal efficiency in L superior OFG and R SOG; degree and betweenness centrality in BIL occipital lobes, R temporal lobe, L paracentral, SMG
Nodal efficiency in L cuneus; degree and betweenness centrality in ACC
Cognitive Control
Cubillo et al., 2010 (15) SBC Switch task (unspecified) 11 (100%) 29 (1) Medication-naïve (100%) Anxiety disorder (9%), mood disorder (27%), CD (9%), substance use disorder (18%) 13 (100%) 28 (1) None None
Hwang et al., 2015 (43) gPPIAFNI Affective Stroop task (incongruent > congruent stimuli) 26 (65%) 14.53 (unspecified) Current stimulant use (42%); medication-free (58%) >24 hours ODD (4%), substance use disorder (8%) 35 (51%) 13.91 (unspecified) L DMFG ↔ R lateral frontal, claustruma L DMFG ↔ L posterior insula
Querne et al., 2017 (44) ICA Flanker task (unspecified) 11 (unspecified) 9.8 (1.7) Medication-naïve (100%) None 11 (unspecified) 10.8 (1.7) Anticorrelation between DMN and frontotemporoparietal regions (direct group comparison not reported) None
Plessen et al., 2016 (45) ICA Flanker task (post-error > post-correct trials) 25 (68%) 10.75 (1.09) Medication-naïve (100%) ODD (40%), ODD+CD (8%), phobia (16%), tics (4%), separation anxiety disorder (4%), elimination disorder (4%) 29 (52%) 10.15 (1.04) None Cingulo-opercular network ↔ VANa
Vloet et al., 2010 (46) PPISPM Time discrimination + stimulus-response compatibility task (stimulus-response compatibility) 14 (100%) 11.3 (2) Past or current stimulant use (100%) >48 hours None 14 (100%) 11.9 (1.4) L IFC ↔ L SPG; R IFC ↔ R SPG None
Zamorano et al., 2017 (47)
PPIFSL
MSIT (incongruent > congruent conditions)
17 (100%)
11.6 (0.86)
Current MPH use (100%)
Medication not taken on study day
None
17 (100%)
11.7 (0.67)
Not reported
R MFG + R IFC ↔ BIL OFC, striatum
Emotion Processing
Hafeman et al., 2017 (61) gPPISPM Emotional dynamic faces task (emotional faces > shapes) 30 (67%) 14.1 (1.8) Current use of stimulants (43%), antipsychotics (10%), antidepressants (10%) Unspecified ODD (53%), CD (3%), depressive disorder (53%), anxiety disorder (3%) 26 (46%) 13.2 (2.2) None BIL amygdala ↔ subgenual cingulate; BIL amygdala ↔ R SFG
Hwang et al., 2015 (43) gPPISPM Affective Stroop task: 1) positive > neutral stimuli; 2) positive > neutral incongruent stimuli; 3) negative > neutral stimuli) 26 (65%) 14.53 (unspecified) Current stimulant use (42%); medication-free (58%) >24 hours ODD (4%), substance use disorder (8%) 35 (51%) 13.91 (unspecified) 1) R amygdala ↔ R MOG, L lentiform nucleus; 2) R amygdala ↔ BIL postcentrala; 3) none None
Park et al., 2016 (55) GTTsb Emotive faces task (unspecified) 34 (59%) 27.88 (3.37) Unspecified Unspecified Unspecified 34 (62%) 29.44 (3.57) Degree in BIL medial frontal, L ACC, L postcentral, R caudate, L insula Degree in L MFG, R SMG, R IPL, L MOG, L IOG, R cerebellum
Posner et al., 2011 (62) DCM Fearful faces task with priming (fearful faces) 15 (87%) 13.5 (1.2) Current stimulant use (100%) >48 hours ODD/CD (% unspecified) 15 (87%) 13.4 (1.2) None R amygdala ↔ R lateral PFC
Schulz et al., 2014 (63) PPISPM Face emotion GNG (correct no-go > go) 14 (100%) 23.3 (2.3) Medication-naïve (29%); past stimulant use but medication-free at time of study (71%) Mood disorder (14%), anxiety disorder (14%), substance use disorder (36%) 14 (100%) 22.8 (2.7) R DLPFC ↔ L IFC, putamen, BIL subgenual cingulate None
Stoddard et al., 2017 (64)
gPPIAFNI
Implicit face emotion processing task (150% intensity across emotions)
24 (75%)
13.5 (2.9)
Unspecified
Unspecified
Unspecified
22 (41%)
14.2 (2.1)
None
L amygdala ↔ L insula
Response Inhibition
Cai et al., 2021 (48) gPPISPM GNG (correct no-go) 27 (78%) 13.95 (2.62) Medication-free during testing (100%) >5 half-lives of drug Unspecified 30 (73%) 13.65 (2.47) R DLPFC ↔ R posterior parietal None
Cubillo et al., 2010 (15) SBC SST (unspecified) 10 (100%) 28 (1) Medication-naïve (100%) Anxiety disorder (10%), mood disorder (30%), CD (10%), substance use disorder (20%) 14 (100%) 28 (2) R IFC ↔ L IFC, R MFG, ACC, PCC, SMA, thalamus, striatum, BIL parietal/temporal/occipital; R ACC/PCC/SMA ↔ R thalamus, striatum None
Massat et al., 2018 (49) PPISPM SST (successful > failed stop) 18 (44%) 10.6 (1.13) Medication-naïve (100%) None 19 (47%) 10 (1.35) R IFC ↔ R OFC, L MFG, IFC R dorsal caudate ↔ R IPL, SPG, L MFG, middle cingulate, precentral, postcentral
Mulder et al., 2011 (50) SBC GNG (unspecified) Sample 1: 11 (100%)
Sample 2: 12 (100%)
Sample 1: 13.97 (3.14) Sample 2: 14.9 (2.3) Sample 1: current stimulant use (55%); medication-free (45%)
Sample 2: current stimulant use (58%); medication-free (42%)
>24 hours Sample 1: ODD (27%)
Sample 2: ODD (33%)
Sample 1: 11 (100%) Sample 2: 12 (100%) Sample 1: 15.27 (1.92) Sample 2: 15 (2.1) Samples 1 and 2: ACC ↔ cerebellum Sample 1: motor cortex ↔ striatuma
Sample 2: not reported
None
van Rooij et al., 2015 (51)
PPIFSLb,c
SST: 1) successful stop > go; 2) failed stop > go)
185 (70%)
17.3 (3.2)
Current medication use, class unspecified (77%); medication-free (23%)
Unspecified
ODD (30%), CD (7%), reading disability (18%)
125 (44%)
16.5 (3.3)
1) L IFC ↔ R putamen; L SFG ↔ L thalamus, operculum; 2) L IFC ↔ R IFC, BIL SFG/preSMA, L occipital cortex, MTG; L SFG ↔ L IFC
1) L IFC ↔ L MTG, cerebellum; L SFG ↔ R ACC, frontal pole, BIL precuneus, L precentral, R cerebellum; 2) L IFC ↔ BIL temporal pole, L cerebellum, R SMG; L SFG ↔ L MTG
Reward Processing
Ceceli et al., 2020 (52) PPIFSL Free operant task with food rewards (late > early phase) 25 (56%) 22.31 (4.69) Current or previous stimulant use (72%); past stimulant use but medication-free at time of study (16%); medication-naïve (12%) 36 hours None 25 (56%) 21.48 (2.92) L posterior putamen ↔ dorsal ACC, medial frontal None
Ma et al., 2016 (53) gPPISPM Rewarded Stroop task (rewarded > neutral Stroop) 25 (76%) 15.36 (1.08) Current MPH use (60%); medication-free (40%) 24 hours ODD and CD (% unspecified) 33 (67%) 15.3 (1.05) None L ventral striatum ↔ R precentral
Mowinckel et al., 2017 (54) Bayesian hierarchical mixed model Value-based decision-making task (unspecified) 20 (35%) 29.9 (1.41) Current stimulant use (100%) >20 hours None 27 (30%) 27.42 (1.23) Within VIS, FPN, ECN, subcortical network, L VAN; ECN ↔ FPN ↔ sensorimotor network; DAN ↔ sensorimotor network; DAN ↔ VIS VAN ↔ DMN; VAN ↔ ECN; DMN ↔ ECN
Park et al., 2016 (55) GTTsb Gambling task: 1) gambling reward; 2) gambling punishment 34 (59%) 27.88 (3.37) Unspecified Unspecified Unspecified 34 (62%) 29.44 (3.57) 1) Degree in BIL SFG, MTG; 2) degree in R medial frontal, MFG, insula, BIL SFG, L IPL, thalamus, parahippocampal 1) Degree in R ACC, L PCC, lingual, thalamus, BIL insula, cerebellum; 2) R precentral, MTG, L postcentral, STG, BIL cerebellum
von Rhein et al., 2017 (56)
ICA
MID task (unspecified)
150 (70%)
17.7 (3)
Unspecified
>48 hours
ODD (23%), CD (5%)
48 (69%)
16.9 (3.2)
Within SAL (R ITG), ECN (R IFC, L cerebellum)
Within SAL (R cerebellum)
Working Memory
Bédard et al., 2014 (57) PPISPM Visuospatial n-back task: 1) 1-back > 0-back; 2) 2-back > 0-back 24 (88%) 13.07 (1.93) Current stimulant use (4%); current nonstimulant use (4%); past stimulant/nonstimulant use but medication-free at time of study (29%); medication-naïve (63%) 2 weeks ODD (8%), CD (4%), anxiety disorder (17%) 21 (76%) 12.44 (1.95) 1) L DLPFC ↔ L PCC; 2) L DLPFC ↔ L midcingulate, PCC 1) L DLPFC ↔ BIL posterior insula, R temporal cortex; 2) L DLPFC ↔ L intraparietal sulcus, cerebellum
Massat et al., 2012 (58) gPPISPM Verbal n-back task (2-back > 0-back) 19 (47%) 10.75 (1.31) Medication-naïve (100%) None 14 (57%) 10.05 (1.28) None R cerebellum ↔ red nucleus, R amygdalaa, hippocampusa, linguala, precuneusa, L IFCa, MFGa, postcentrala, cerebelluma; L occipital ↔ BIL MFGa, R MTGa, STGa, fusiforma, putamena, L cerebelluma; L IPL ↔ BIL IFCa, MFGa, STGa, L ACCa, SMAa; R caudate ↔ BIL MFGa, R SFGa, putamena, insulaa
Park et al., 2016 (55) GTTsb Visuospatial n-back task (unspecified) 34 (59%) 27.88 (3.37) Unspecified Unspecified Unspecified 34 (62%) 29.44 (3.57) Degree in L precuneus, MTG, cuneus, insula Degree in L precentral, IPL, cerebellum, R MFG, IFC, STG, BIL SFG, caudate
Wolf et al., 2009 (59) ICA Verbal working memory task (unspecified) 12 (100%) 22.2 (4.4) Current MPH use (50%); past MPH use but medication-free at time of study (50%) 72 hours None 12 (100%) 21.6 (4.7) Within BIL IFC, SFG, SPG, cerebellum, L ACC, medial frontal Within L dorsal cingulate, cuneus, R IFC, SFG
Wu et al., 2017 (60)
ICA
Verbal n-back task (2-back > 0-back)
22 (100%)
12.71 (1.55)
Past stimulant use but medication-free at time of study (23%); medication-naïve (77%)
>4 weeks
ODD (18%)
30 (100%)
11.96 (1.72)
Within ECN (L SMG, insula)
Within FPN (L postcentral, SPG), auditory network (R cuneus, occipital pole, supracalcarine, intracalcarine, lateral SOG, precuneus)
Other Cognitive Functions
Chevrier et al., 2019 (65) SBC SST: 1) error detection; 2) post-error slowing 14 (50%) 13.7 (2.1) Current stimulant use (43%); medication-free (57%) 24 hours ODD (14%) 14 (64%) 15.4 (1.6) 1) SN ↔ medial septal; 2) LC ↔ L amygdala, L hypothalamus; medial septal nuclei ↔ R amygdala, LC, R hypothalamus; raphe nucleus ↔ R SN/parahippocampal 1) Dorsal striatum ↔ R IPL; SN ↔ R hypothalamus; SN ↔ L amygdala, LC, raphe nucleus; 2) ventral pallidum ↔ SN/parahippocampal, R dorsal pallidum, L amygdala; SN ↔ L hypothalamus; LC ↔ R IFC; medial septal nuclei ↔ BIL amygdala, L SN, BIL basal forebrain; raphe nucleus ↔ BIL amygdala, R SN, BIL hypothalamus
Clerkin et al., 2013 (66) PPISPM Cued reaction time task (cues > noncues) 35 (83%) 24.6 (2.04) Current stimulant use (6%); past stimulant use but medication-free at time of study (71%) >48 hours Mood disorder (23%), anxiety disorder (23%), substance use disorder (43%) 32 (84%) 24.38 (2.4) R thalamus ↔ pons None
Park et al., 2016 (55) GTTsb Motor task (unspecified) 34 (59%) 27.88 (3.37) Unspecified Unspecified Unspecified 34 (62%) 29.44 (3.57) Degree in R precentral, medial frontal, SMG, L MFG, precuneus, cuneus, parahippocampal, cerebellum, BIL MTG, MOG Degree in BIL SFG, PCC, R MFG, ACC, L postcentral
GTTsb Relational processing task (unspecified) 34 (59%) 27.88 (3.37) Unspecified Unspecified Unspecified 34 (62%) 29.44 (3.57) Degree in R medial frontal, SFG, BIL ACC, L lingual, cerebellum Degree in R PCC, cuneus, BIL IPL, STG, L MTG
GTTsb Social cognition task (unspecified) 35 (59%) 27.88 (3.37) Unspecified Unspecified Unspecified 34 (62%) 29.44 (3.57) Degree in BIL SFG, R PCC, L cuneus Degree in L precentral, postcentral, cerebellum, BIL precuneus, R MTG
Vloet et al., 2010 (46) PPISPM Time discrimination + stimulus-response compatibility task (time discrimination) 14 (100%) 11.3 (2) Past or current stimulant use (100%) >48 hours None 14 (100%) 11.9 (1.4) R IFC ↔ R cerebellum None

ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BIL, bilateral; CD, conduct disorder; CPT, continuous performance task; DAN, dorsal attention network; DCM, dynamic causal modeling; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; DMFG, dorsomedial frontal gyrus; DMN, default mode network; ECN, executive control network; fMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging; FPN, frontoparietal network; GNG, go/no-go; gPPI, generalized psychophysiological interaction; GTT, graph theoretic technique; ICA, independent component analysis; IFC, inferior frontal cortex; IOG, inferior occipital gyrus; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; L, left; LC, locus coeruleus; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; MID, monetary incentive delay; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; MPH, methylphenidate; MSIT, multi-source interference task; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; ODD, oppositional defiant disorder; OFG, orbitofrontal gyrus; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; PFC, prefrontal cortex; PPI, psychophysiological interaction; preSMA, pre–supplementary motor area; R, right; SAL, salience network; SBC, seed-based correlation; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; SMA, supplementary motor area; SMG, supramarginal gyrus; SN, substantia nigra; SOG, superior occipital gyrus; SPG, superior parietal gyrus; SST, stop signal task; STG, superior temporal gyrus; VAN, ventral attention network; VIS, visual network.

a

Correction for multiple comparisons not specified.

b

White matter and cerebrospinal fluid signal regressors included in the model in addition to standard motion parameters.

c

Scrubbing regressors included in the model for volumes with excessive motion in addition to standard motion parameters.