Skip to main content
. 2001 Sep;8(5):891–894. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.8.5.891-894.2001

TABLE 4.

Test of significance in relapse rates among different groups

Groups compared χ2 or c valuea P value Table no.
Primaquine vs bulaquine (1-yr follow-up) χ2 = 0.44 (df = 1) 0.7 > P > 0.5 1
Combined treatment vs placebo (1-yr follow-up) χ2 = 9.66 (df = 1) 0.01 > P > 0.001 1
Short term in primaquine vs bulaquine (within 6 mo) χ2 = 0.05 (df = 1) 0.9 > P > 0.8 2
Long term in primaquine vs bulaquine (within 7–12 mo) χ2 = 1.39 (df = 1) 0.3 > P > 0.2 2
Short term in combined vs placebo (within 6 mo) χ2 = 0.83 (df = 1) 0.4 > P > 0.3 2
Long term in combined vs placebo (within 7–12 mo) χ2 = 9.49 (df = 1) 0.01 > P > 0.001 2
Short and long in placebo, first half yr vs second half yr χ2 = 15.40 (df = 2) P < 0.001 3
Short and long in bulaquine vs primaquine, first half yr χ2 = 4.82 (df = 2) 0.1 > P > 0.05 3
Short and long in bulaquine vs primaquine, second half yr χ2 = 0.83 (df = 2) 0.7 > P > 0.6 3
Short and long in combined vs placebo, first half yr χ2 = 0.40 (df = 2) 0.9 > P > 0.8 3
Short and long in combined vs placebo, second half yr χ2 = 12.02 (df = 2) 0.01 > P > 0.001 3
Short term in combined vs placebo, first half yr c = 0.57 0.60 > P > 0.50 3
Short term in combined vs placebo, second half yr c = 0.66 0.50 > P > 0.40 3
Short term in combined, first half yr vs second half yr c = 2.94 0.01 > P > 0.001 3
Long term in combined vs placebo, first half yr c = 0.17 0.9 > P > 0.8 3
Long term in combined vs placebo, second half yr c = 3.02 0.01 > P > 0.001 3
Long term in combined, first half yr vs second half yr c = 4.11 P < 0.001 3
a

∗, significant; df, degrees of freedom.