Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 11;32(13):2972–2979.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.05.022

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Robust escape behavior in individually housed mice

(A) Schematic showing the experimental arena containing a circular-shaped shelter and the threat zone (TZ), above which looming stimuli were presented. Looming stimuli were composed of 5 sequential expanding spots.

(B) Image frames from a single trial in chronological order showing the mouse entering the threat zone (B1), turning towards the shelter after stimulus onset (B2), fleeing (B3), and finding refuge inside the shelter (B4).

(C) A single example trace of the position of the mouse from the trial shown in (B).

(D) Population data showing positional traces of all trials from all mice housed in IVCs for between 2–7 days (traces are classified as escape [solid line], freezing [dashed line], or no reaction [solid grey line]).

(E) Population data showing positional traces of all trials from all mice housed in IVCs for at least 28 days.

(F) Overall percentage of trials classified as escape according to IVC housing period.

(G) Peak speed of escape plotted for all trials where escape responses were observed in mice singly housed for either 2–7 days (black, n = 44 mice) or more than 28 days (purple, n = 20 mice). Horizontal lines indicate the median values for each group.

(H) Left: percentage of escape trials plotted against the number of looming spots presented prior to escape for all mice isolated for between 2–7 days versus all mice group housed in the enriched pen. Only trials that were classified as escapes are shown. Right: percentage of all trials that were classified as no escape and includes freezing trials.