Table 3.
Variables | Chi-square/df | GFI | TLI | CFI | RMSR; 95%CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 (WB) | 2.48***/ df = 116 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.04; 95%CI [0.03;0.05] |
Model 2 (LS) | 3.25***/ df = 32 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.07;95%CI [0.05;0.08] |
Model 3 | 3.07***/df = 85 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.07; 95%CI [0.06;0.08] |
Model 4 | 7.76***/df = 85 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.12;95%CI [0.110;1.3] |
Model 5 | 4.3***/df = 85 | 0.80 | 0.09 | 0.95 | 0.08;95%CI [0.74;0.91] |
Model 6 | 3.12***/df = 85 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.07;95%CI [0.06;0.08] |
***p < .001; LS Life satisfaction; WB: Psychological well-being. Model 1: Self-compassion is independent, hope is a mediator variable, and psychological well-being is dependent. Model 2: self-compassion is independent, hope is a mediator variable, predicting life satisfaction. Model 3: self-compassion is independent, hope is a mediator, predicting life satisfaction and psychological well-being. Model 4: Psychological well-being and life satisfaction are independents, hope is a mediator, and self-compassion is dependent. Model 5: Hope is dependent on psychological well-being, life satisfaction is independent, and self-compassion is the mediator. Model 6: Hope is independent, life satisfaction, psychological well-being are mediators in presenting self-compassion