Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 Jul 18;49(6):927–942. doi: 10.1007/s10488-022-01206-1

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study sample

Variable M SD Min. Max. Missing (%)

Clinics (K = 21)
 EBP implementation climate (0 – 4) 1.93 .37 1.32 2.64 0
 Innovation & flexibility climate (1 – 4) 3.02 .37 2.35 3.63 0
 N youth served in prior year 387.43 243.50 95 1000 0
Therapists (N = 177)
 Use of MBC to monitor client progress (1 – 4) 2.17 .86 1.00 4.00 0
 Use of MBC to modify treatment (1 – 4) 1.44 .50 1.00 3.00 0
 MBC attitudes: Practicality (1 – 4) 3.43 .68 1.60 5.00 0
 MBC attitudes: Clinical utility (1 – 5) 3.25 .55 1.71 4.86 <1
 MBC attitudes: Treatment planning benefit (1– 4) 3.68 .52 1.40 5.00 0
 Graduate training in MBC (0 – 3) 1.33 .93 0 3 <1
 Experience with MBC (0 – 4) 1.58 .97 0 4 1
 Years of clinical experience 6.63 6.48 0 37 2
 Years tenure in clinic 3.36 3.71 0 19 2
 Age (in years) 39.06 9.98 24 65 3

n % Missing (%)

Employment model 1
 Salaried 68 38.9
 Contractor 107 61.1
Employment Status 2
 Part-time Employee 43 16.9
 Full-time Employee 130 78.5
Race 8
 Asian 4 2.3
 Black or African American 2 1.1
 More than one race 2 1.1
 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 2 1.1
 Other 8 4.5
 White 145 89.9
Ethnicity 2
 Identify as Hispanic/Latino 19 10.7
 Do not identify as Hispanic/Latino 154 87.0
Gender 2
 Male 30 16.9
 Female 139 78.5
 Other gender identity 5 2.8
Education <1
 Doctoral Degree 7 4.0
 Non-Doctoral Degree 169 95.5

Note: EBP = evidence-based practice; MBC = measurement-based care.