Table 4.
Therapists' Perceptions Regarding Quality of Telerehabilitation
| STATEMENT | AGREE n (%) | NEUTRAL n (%) | DISAGREE n (%) | MISSING n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) I felt fully competent and prepared while delivering telerehabilitation sessions to my clients. (N = 104) | 46 (44.2) | 24 (23.1) | 34 (32.7) | 3 (2.8) |
| (2) I had all the basic knowledge and resources (e.g., operational guidelines, research support) to successfully conduct telerehabilitation sessions. (N = 103) | 40 (38.8) | 22 (21.4) | 41 (39.8) | 4 (3.7) |
| (3) I am confident in my ability to– | ||||
| Assess/evaluate children during telerehabilitation sessions. (N = 102) | 33 (32.4) | 20 (19.6) | 49 (48) | 5 (4.7) |
| Treat children during telerehabilitation sessions. (N = 100) | 70 (70) | 20 (20) | 10 (10) | 7 (7) |
| Determine eligibility for future care for children during telerehabilitation sessions. (N = 99) | 51 (51.5) | 24 (24.2) | 24 (24.2) | 8 (7.5) |
| (4) I feel I was able to deliver equivalent care in telerehabilitation as during standard therapy sessions. (N = 102) | 21 (20.1) | 23 (22.5) | 58 (56.9) | 5 (4.7) |
| (5) I was able to achieve all required therapy goals during my telerehabilitation sessions. (N = 104) | 26 (25) | 22 (21.2) | 56 (53.8) | 3 (2.8) |
| (6) I feel that families/caregivers were satisfied with the delivery of telerehabilitation sessions. (N = 103) | 67 (65) | 27 (26.2) | 9 (8.7) | 4 (3.7) |
| (7) I feel the families/caregivers perceived the telerehabilitation sessions to be equally beneficial as standard in-person sessions. (N = 103) | 22 (21.4) | 40 (38.8) | 41 (39.8) | 4 (3.7) |