Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 17;13:1018450. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1018450

Table 2.

The evidence quality for the outcomes (GRADE system).

Outcomes (N) AWMD (95% CI) ROB Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Sample size Evidence quality
Interventions Comparison
HbA1c (3) -0.283 (-0.561, -0.004) none none none serious none 203 208 MODERATE
⊕⊕⊕
FBG (3) -0.314 (-1.599, 0.972) none serious none serious none 203 208 MODERATE
⊕⊕⊕
2h-PG (3) -0.152 (-0.778, -0.474) none serious none serious none 203 208 MODERATE
⊕⊕⊕

AWMD, adjusted weighted mean difference; ROB, risk of bias; N, numbers of RCTs; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation